Wizard: Add Kernel name input (HMS-5204)

[regexowl]

This adds a kernel name input.

JIRA: HMS-5204

[regexowl]

/jira-epic HMS-5192

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 97.77778% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 84.77%. Comparing base (563ff04) to head (d814450).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...ImageWizard/steps/Kernel/components/KernelName.tsx	97.03%	4 Missing ⚠️

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2690      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   84.66%   84.77%   +0.10%     
==========================================
  Files         186      186              
  Lines       21008    21182     +174     
  Branches     2035     2067      +32     
==========================================
+ Hits        17787    17957     +170     
- Misses       3199     3203       +4     
  Partials       22       22              

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...Components/CreateImageWizard/CreateImageWizard.tsx	99.49% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
...nents/CreateImageWizard/utilities/requestMapper.ts	94.69% <100.00%> (+0.08%)	⬆️
...ents/CreateImageWizard/utilities/useValidation.tsx	97.63% <100.00%> (+0.21%)	⬆️
src/Components/CreateImageWizard/validators.ts	94.62% <100.00%> (+0.50%)	⬆️
src/store/wizardSlice.ts	88.78% <100.00%> (+0.07%)	⬆️
...ImageWizard/steps/Kernel/components/KernelName.tsx	97.12% <97.03%> (-2.88%)	⬇️

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 563ff04...d814450. Read the comment docs.

[regexowl]

/retest

[regexowl]

Not completely sure about the validation pattern. Didn't find much information in blueprint reference or stages 🤔

[lucasgarfield]

What I've learned is that when a kernel is specified, DNF is actually used to install it. So it would need to follow whatever the rules for package names in DNF are. I'm sure there must be a standard for that we can find, although my Google-fu has failed me. I did find something for Ubuntu:

https://askubuntu.com/questions/1262528/what-are-usable-characters-are-for-package-names#:~:text=Package%20names%20(both%20source%20and,start%20with%20an%20alphanumeric%20character.

I think if we could find something similar for RH we would have our answer.

[regexowl]

Replaced the input with a simple select in new commit. Can squash later if needed, but wanted to see if this makes more sense first.

[mgold1234]

@regexowl it is looking awsome!
one small thing, I am little confusing why I see the Append without any box, maybe we can remove it fom now for that pr?

[regexowl]

/retest

[lucasgarfield]

debug, rt, and rt-debug all fail with the same error:

I wonder if something in the backend is broken?

[ochosi]

debug, rt, and rt-debug all fail with the same error:

I wonder if something in the backend is broken?

What happens if you try the API directly?

[regexowl]

That's weird, I've tried to build an image with "kernel-debug" and the build seems successful (RHEL 9 .qcow2)

[regexowl]

Hmm, but rt fails immediately...

[regexowl]

Tried to create a blueprint via API (below) and rt failed immediately, same as via UI.

{
  "name": "kernel-name",
  "description": "",
  "distribution": "rhel-9",
  "image_requests": [
  {
    "architecture": "x86_64",
    "image_type": "guest-image",
    "upload_request": {
      "options": {},
      "type": "aws.s3"
    }
  }
  ],
  "customizations": {
    "kernel": {
      "name": "kernel-debug"
    }
  }
}

[regexowl]

/retest

[regexowl]

@lucasgarfield I've removed the validator for now as it isn't used anywhere.

[regexowl]

Adding custom name option.

[regexowl]

Allows to add a custom kernel name:

[regexowl]

Wasn't sure if we want the alert or not. There's a validation for the kernel name format, but even if that passes the build might fail with kernel package that's not included.

[croissanne]

lgtm, though I wonder if something like a text input with a suggestion autocomplete exists? so we could suggest the default options?

[regexowl]

lgtm, though I wonder if something like a text input with a suggestion autocomplete exists? so we could suggest the default options?

Thanks for the review! The default options are there when you click on the input

The create option gets rendered when there's a text input that doesn't match any of the default options

[regexowl]

/retest

[regexowl]

/retest