Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cross-OS build/deployment #4

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 5, 2024
Merged

Cross-OS build/deployment #4

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 5, 2024

Conversation

chemix-lunacy
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@chemix-lunacy chemix-lunacy force-pushed the jd/py-deploy branch 26 times, most recently from e1a3d12 to ec5873b Compare March 3, 2024 11:02
# export PATH="/root/.cargo/bin:${PATH}"
# export PATH="/root/.local/bin:$PATH"
# cd src/munchkin
# MK_DOWNLOAD_LLVM=true pwsh ./build.ps1
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it's about time we enable the cache back, only reason why it didn't get through in BB was cache size limitation ... 🤔

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not sure how GH workflow is, would it run a builds as per the defined matix support here ?
I mean how do you test each of these build types ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It runs in the various OS images, all the linux ones run, the winedows one didn't run (but I made modifications locally so now should run), Mac one will likely be untested.

@chemix-lunacy chemix-lunacy merged commit b7810bb into develop Mar 5, 2024
0 of 2 checks passed
@chemix-lunacy chemix-lunacy deleted the jd/py-deploy branch March 5, 2024 00:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants