Stale directory entries after live-rollback

[ahrens]

System information

Type	Version/Name
Distribution Name	Ubuntu
Distribution Version	18.04
Linux Kernel	4.15
Architecture	x86
ZFS Version	master
SPL Version

Describe the problem you're observing

After zfs rollback on a mounted filesystem, some files which are no longer present still seem to be in the directory. This most likely due to dentry caching, which was recently modified by 5a6ac4c (#9549). This is causing zfs_rollback_001_pos to fail in our environment.

Describe how to reproduce the problem

Run zfs_rollback_001_pos, or this simpler test program (thanks @jwk404):

#!/bin/ksh -x

zpool destroy testpool
zpool create testpool sdb
zfs create testpool/testfs
cp /etc/passwd /testpool/testfs/testfile0
sync
zfs snapshot testpool/testfs@testsnap
cp /etc/passwd /testpool/testfs/testfile1
sync
zfs snapshot testpool/testfs@testsnap1
cp /etc/passwd /testpool/testfs/testfile2
sync
zfs snapshot testpool/testfs@testsnap2
dd if=/dev/urandom of=/testpool/testfs/testfile1 &
sleep 3

zfs rollback -r testpool/testfs@testsnap
echo rollback return: $?

[[ -e /testpool/testfs/testfile0 ]] ||   echo Fail: file 0 not present
[[ ! -e /testpool/testfs/testfile1 ]] || echo Fail: file 1 present
[[ ! -e /testpool/testfs/testfile2 ]] || echo Fail: file 2 present

echo ls output:
/bin/ls /testpool/testfs

pkill -x dd

The output will indicate that testfile1 is still present. However, ls /testpool/testfs/festfile1 will fail. In terms of system calls, the test program (ksh) does:

access("/testpool/testfs/testfile1", F_OK) = 0

And ls does:

stat("/testpool/testfs/testfile1", 0x558634db6b68) = -1 EIO (Input/output error)

Include any warning/errors/backtraces from the system logs

[ahrens]

@snajpa Could you take a look at this?

[ahrens]

According to the comment in #9549:

Negative dentries and stale inodes are solved by flushing the dcache for the
particular dataset on zfs_resume_fs call.

Are we sure that the dcache is actually completely flushed, even if there are open files?

[behlendorf]

Are we sure that the dcache is actually completely flushed, even if there are open files?

I believe you're right, the dentries for open files won't be dropped. This is why we originally settled on revalidate to determine if they were still valid after a rollback.

It sounds like we'll need to find an alternate way to handle this so they're not visible after a rollback. Looking through the kernel source I don't immediately see a way to accomplish this. @snajpa unless you have a suggestion, why don't we revert #9549 while other options are investigated.

[snajpa]

@behlendorf yes, let's revert it. If open files are the only problem, we could track those and take care of the list of them on the zfs_resume_fs call. I'll dig into this + add more tests for it. I'll open a new PR when I have a working prototype.

[snajpa]

One major upside to things now is that we don't have to bother with anything older than 3.10, so I need to walk around the Linux dcache code of that version more, but IIRC it's going to simplify things for me quite a bit.

[behlendorf]

@ahrens @snajpa opened #9592 with a proposed partial revert for this issue and further discussion. This regression ended up slipping through the CI since the zfs-report.py script included an exception for zfs_rollback_001_pos so it was not treated as a failure. See #6143, #6415, and #6416.