Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

strange message #72

Closed
L0cutus opened this issue Oct 21, 2010 · 2 comments
Closed

strange message #72

L0cutus opened this issue Oct 21, 2010 · 2 comments

Comments

@L0cutus
Copy link

L0cutus commented Oct 21, 2010

/usr/libexec/zfs/zconfig.sh -c
1 persistent zpool.cache zfs.sh: Unload these modules with 'zfs.sh -u':
zfs zcommon zunicode znvpair zavl spl zlib_deflate

i have also zfs-fuse installed and in use.

@behlendorf
Copy link
Contributor

The zconfig.sh test suite requires that you start it without any of the ZFS kernel modules loaded. This is because the test suite verifies the correct ZFS behavior when the modules are loaded/unload among other things. You just need to remove the ZFS module stack by running the command in the error message. This will unload all the ZFS kernel modules so you can run the regression test.

zfs.sh -u

@behlendorf
Copy link
Contributor

Closing issue.

@ghost ghost mentioned this issue Nov 6, 2011
dajhorn referenced this issue in zfsonlinux/pkg-zfs Jan 6, 2012
If the lsb-release package is installed on an Arch Linux distribution,
the configure step will incorrectly detect the running distribution as
Ubuntu. This is a result of both distributions providing an
/etc/lsb-release file, and the Ubuntu VENDOR check being performed
first.

Since the Arch Linux test check's for a file more specific to the Arch
Linux distribution, moving Arch Linux's VENDOR check above Unbuntu's
check provides a quick and easy solution.

Signed-off-by: Prakash Surya <surya1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Closes #72
ahrens added a commit to ahrens/zfs that referenced this issue Sep 5, 2019
Signed-off-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
@bud4 bud4 mentioned this issue Jan 29, 2021
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants