【FIX】Update service topology for k8s 1.21 and unit test

[JameKeal]

What type of PR is this?

/kind bug

What this PR does / why we need it:

The service takes effect in the new version

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

https://github.com/openyurtio/openyurt/issues/789

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

other Note

[openyurt-bot]

@JameKeal: GitHub didn't allow me to assign the following users: your_reviewer.

Note that only openyurtio members, repo collaborators and people who have commented on this issue/PR can be assigned. Additionally, issues/PRs can only have 10 assignees at the same time.
For more information please see the contributor guide

In response to this:

What type of PR is this?

/kind bug

What this PR does / why we need it:

The service takes effect in the new version

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

https://github.com/openyurtio/openyurt/issues/789

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

other Note

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[rambohe-ch]

@JameKeal Adapt service topology for K8s v1.21.x, but k8s libraries version in go.mod are updated to v1.22.3, I think if we update go.mod in this pull request, maybe other features could not work.

[JameKeal]

@JameKeal Adapt service topology for K8s v1.21.x, but k8s libraries version in go.mod are updated to v1.22.3, I think if we update go.mod in this pull request, maybe other features could not work.

By your means, if I don't update go.mod, someone who pull the master branch to build code, it's also fail.

If you think it's not a problem, I can recover the go.mod.

[Congrool]

Adapt service topology for K8s v1.21.x, but k8s libraries version in go.mod are updated to v1.22.3, I think if we update go.mod in this pull request, maybe other features could not work.

I think we can merge #821 before this pr, at that time, everything will be ok.

[rambohe-ch]

Fixes #789

[rambohe-ch]

@JameKeal please rebase the newest master branch.

[rambohe-ch]

/lgtm
/approve

[openyurt-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: JameKeal, rambohe-ch

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [rambohe-ch]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment