-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add 4.18 regress job #60739
add 4.18 regress job #60739
Conversation
@qiliRedHat,
Interacting with pj-rehearseComment: Once you are satisfied with the results of the rehearsals, comment: |
6f83a18
to
bb9cb8d
Compare
@qiliRedHat,
Interacting with pj-rehearseComment: Once you are satisfied with the results of the rehearsals, comment: |
/pj-rehearse pull-ci-openshift-svt-master-regression-aws-4.18-nightly-x86-ingress-scale-test |
@qiliRedHat: now processing your pj-rehearse request. Please allow up to 10 minutes for jobs to trigger or cancel. |
2056eb9
to
f711afb
Compare
/pj-rehearse pull-ci-openshift-svt-master-regression-aws-4.18-nightly-x86-ingress-scale-test |
@qiliRedHat: now processing your pj-rehearse request. Please allow up to 10 minutes for jobs to trigger or cancel. |
f711afb
to
1114779
Compare
/pj-rehearse pull-ci-openshift-svt-master-regression-aws-4.18-nightly-x86-ingress-scale-test |
@qiliRedHat: now processing your pj-rehearse request. Please allow up to 10 minutes for jobs to trigger or cancel. |
1114779
to
213e897
Compare
/pj-rehearse pull-ci-openshift-svt-master-regression-aws-4.18-nightly-x86-ingress-scale-test |
@qiliRedHat: now processing your pj-rehearse request. Please allow up to 10 minutes for jobs to trigger or cancel. |
213e897
to
da4ae4b
Compare
/pj-rehearse pull-ci-openshift-svt-master-regression-aws-4.18-nightly-x86-ingress-scale-test |
@qiliRedHat: now processing your pj-rehearse request. Please allow up to 10 minutes for jobs to trigger or cancel. |
@paigerube14 PTAL |
4700921
to
8f2442e
Compare
@qiliRedHat,
Interacting with pj-rehearseComment: Once you are satisfied with the results of the rehearsals, comment: |
8f2442e
to
30e9715
Compare
@qiliRedHat,
Interacting with pj-rehearseComment: Once you are satisfied with the results of the rehearsals, comment: |
30e9715
to
10adb96
Compare
/pj-rehearse ack |
@qiliRedHat: now processing your pj-rehearse request. Please allow up to 10 minutes for jobs to trigger or cancel. |
@paigerube14 PTAL. I addes ES credentials to the step to have ingres-perf in my scripts to run. |
[REHEARSALNOTIFIER]
Interacting with pj-rehearseComment: Once you are satisfied with the results of the rehearsals, comment: |
/pj-rehearse pull-ci-openshift-svt-master-regression-aws-4.18-nightly-x86-networkpolicy-scale-ocp-41535 |
@qiliRedHat: now processing your pj-rehearse request. Please allow up to 10 minutes for jobs to trigger or cancel. |
@qiliRedHat I'm not sure if we want to index these regression test results into elastic search and I'm not sure if the indexing properly worked
|
@paigerube14
While in the first 2 cases ingresss-scale and ingress-tunning, I want to have the data indexed to ES because the test needs to compare performance from grafana dashboard. To do that I had the ES_SERVER defined in run_ingress_perf() func. If any case need kube-burner to index to ES as well, we can do the same to define ES_SERVER in the test case script. |
@qiliRedHat makes sense, I just don't think we should get in the habit of pushing data to ES for these test cases. The folder we are using is much older and don't want to be posting incorrect documents that mess up the ES instance |
/lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: paigerube14, qiliRedHat The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/pj-rehearse ack |
@qiliRedHat: now processing your pj-rehearse request. Please allow up to 10 minutes for jobs to trigger or cancel. |
@qiliRedHat: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
Added 3 test cases
case 1 and 2
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPQE-28086
depends on openshift/svt#803 and openshift/svt#804 's merge
Test passed https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/test-platform-results/pr-logs/pull/openshift_release/60739/rehearse-60739-pull-ci-openshift-svt-master-regression-aws-4.18-nightly-x86-ingress-scale-test/1881906571550658560
case 3
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPQE-28152
depends on openshift/svt#806 merge
Test passed https://gcsweb-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/test-platform-results/pr-logs/pull/openshift_release/60739/rehearse-60739-pull-ci-openshift-svt-master-regression-aws-4.18-nightly-x86-networkpolicy-scale-ocp-41535/1882324539698843648/artifacts/networkpolicy-scale-ocp-41535/openshift-svt-regression/build-log.txt