OCPBUGS-7555: UPSTREAM: <carry>: add default kubelet sysctls within rpm

[rphillips]

What type of PR is this?

/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:

This PR adds sysctls to the operating system via the RPM to default some options for the Kubelet. This will allow us to enable protectKernelDefaults by default via openshift/machine-config-operator#3556.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:

[openshift-ci-robot]

@rphillips: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

• cd90c7d|UPSTREAM: : add default sysctls for kubelet in rpm: does not specify an upstream backport in the commit message

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@rphillips: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

• 4272506|UPSTREAM: : add default sysctls for kubelet in rpm: does not specify an upstream backport in the commit message

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@rphillips: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

• 8f3398e|UPSTREAM: : add default sysctls for kubelet in rpm: does not specify an upstream backport in the commit message

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

[rphillips]

I changed the sysctl run level to 50- instead of 75-. This correlates better with what is installed.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@rphillips: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

• 3716009|UPSTREAM: : add default sysctls for kubelet in rpm: does not specify an upstream backport in the commit message

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

[rphillips]

/cherry-pick release-4.12

[openshift-cherrypick-robot]

@rphillips: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-4.12 in a new PR and assign it to you.

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.12

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@rphillips: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-7555, which is invalid:

• expected the bug to target the "4.13.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

What type of PR is this?

/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:

This PR adds sysctls to the operating system via the RPM to default some options for the Kubelet. This will allow us to enable protectKernelDefaults by default via openshift/machine-config-operator#3556.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[rphillips]

/jira refresh

[openshift-ci-robot]

@rphillips: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-7555, which is invalid:

• expected the bug to target the "4.13.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[rphillips]

/jira refresh

[openshift-ci-robot]

@rphillips: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-7555, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug target version (4.13.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.13.0)
• bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (schoudha@redhat.com), skipping review request.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[mrunalp]

/lgtm

[rphillips]

/assign @soltysh

[rphillips]

/retest-required

[soltysh]

/approve
/remove-label backports/unvalidated-commits
/label backports/validated-commits

[soltysh]

/retest-required

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mrunalp, rphillips, soltysh, travier

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• DOWNSTREAM_OWNERS [soltysh]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[openshift-ci]

@rphillips: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
ci/prow/4.11-upgrade-from-stable-4.10-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade	3716009	link	false	/test 4.11-upgrade-from-stable-4.10-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-ovn-cmd	3716009	link	false	/test e2e-agnostic-ovn-cmd
ci/prow/k8s-e2e-aws-ovn-serial	3716009	link	false	/test k8s-e2e-aws-ovn-serial

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@rphillips: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

• openshift/kubernetes#1475

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-7555 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

What type of PR is this?

/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:

This PR adds sysctls to the operating system via the RPM to default some options for the Kubelet. This will allow us to enable protectKernelDefaults by default via openshift/machine-config-operator#3556.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-cherrypick-robot]

@rphillips: new pull request created: #1478

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.12

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.