Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Bug 1897346: NFD worker pods not scheduled on a 3 node master/worker cluster #110

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 17, 2020
Merged

Bug 1897346: NFD worker pods not scheduled on a 3 node master/worker cluster #110

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 17, 2020

Conversation

ArangoGutierrez
Copy link
Contributor

Signed-off-by: Carlos Eduardo Arango Gutierrez carangog@redhat.com

@ArangoGutierrez
master:worker use case
376960e 
Signed-off-by: Carlos Eduardo Arango Gutierrez <carangog@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/severity-unspecified Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is unspecified for the PR. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Nov 13, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@ArangoGutierrez: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1897346, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.7.0" release, but it targets "---" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1897346: NFD worker pods not scheduler on a 3 node master/worker cluster

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@ArangoGutierrez
Copy link
Contributor Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/severity-unspecified Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is unspecified for the PR. labels Nov 13, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@ArangoGutierrez: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1897346, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.7.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.7.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Nov 13, 2020
@ArangoGutierrez
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherry-pic release-4.6

@zvonkok
Copy link
Contributor

zvonkok commented Nov 13, 2020

/approve

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 13, 2020
@zvonkok
Copy link
Contributor

zvonkok commented Nov 13, 2020

/cherry-pick release-4.6

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

@zvonkok: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-4.6 in a new PR and assign it to you.

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.6

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@zvonkok
Copy link
Contributor

zvonkok commented Nov 13, 2020

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 13, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ArangoGutierrez, zvonkok

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@zvonkok zvonkok changed the title Bug 1897346: NFD worker pods not scheduler on a 3 node master/worker cluster Bug 1897346: NFD worker pods not scheduled on a 3 node master/worker cluster Nov 13, 2020
@ArangoGutierrez
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherrypick release 4.6

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

@ArangoGutierrez: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release 4.6 in a new PR and assign it to you.

In response to this:

/cherrypick release 4.6

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@ArangoGutierrez
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

1 similar comment
@ArangoGutierrez
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@ArangoGutierrez
Copy link
Contributor Author

ArangoGutierrez commented Nov 13, 2020 •
edited
Loading

Fix: #109

@ArangoGutierrez
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@ArangoGutierrez
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@ArangoGutierrez
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

5 similar comments
@ArangoGutierrez
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@ArangoGutierrez
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@ArangoGutierrez
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@ArangoGutierrez
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@ArangoGutierrez
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@ArangoGutierrez
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-upgrade

@ArangoGutierrez
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-aws

@ArangoGutierrez
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

4 similar comments
@ArangoGutierrez
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@ArangoGutierrez
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@ArangoGutierrez
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@ArangoGutierrez
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@ArangoGutierrez
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-aws
/test e2e-upgrade

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@ArangoGutierrez
Copy link
Contributor Author

Something is wrong with this tests, setting the PR on hold while I investigate with the DPTP team
/hold

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 16, 2020
@ArangoGutierrez
Copy link
Contributor Author

/unhold

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 17, 2020
@ArangoGutierrez
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit a9fd54f into openshift:master Nov 17, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@ArangoGutierrez: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 1897346 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1897346: NFD worker pods not scheduled on a 3 node master/worker cluster

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Nov 17, 2020
Closed
@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

@zvonkok: new pull request created: #111

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.6

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

@ArangoGutierrez: cannot checkout release 4.6: error checking out release 4.6: exit status 1. output: error: pathspec 'release 4.6' did not match any file(s) known to git

In response to this:

/cherrypick release 4.6

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

ArangoGutierrez added a commit to ArangoGutierrez/cluster-nfd-operator that referenced this pull request Jan 8, 2021
@ArangoGutierrez
This is an manual cherry-pick of openshift#110
fc1564e 
Signed-off-by: Carlos Eduardo Arango Gutierrez <carangog@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot mentioned this pull request Jan 8, 2021
Merged
openshift-merge-robot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 22, 2021
@openshift-merge-robot
Merge pull request #120 from ArangoGutierrez/manual_cherry_111
60fb896 
Bug 1898510: This is an manual cherry-pick of #110
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@Deepthidharwar Deepthidharwar Awaiting requested review from Deepthidharwar

@zvonkok zvonkok Awaiting requested review from zvonkok

Assignees

@zvonkok zvonkok

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
6 participants
@ArangoGutierrez @openshift-ci-robot @zvonkok @openshift-cherrypick-robot @openshift-bot @openshift-merge-robot