-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug 1860229: Fail machine if create request doesn't succeed #155
Bug 1860229: Fail machine if create request doesn't succeed #155
Conversation
@alexander-demichev: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1860229, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
var detailedError autorest.DetailedError | ||
if errors.As(err, &detailedError) && detailedError.Message == "Failure sending request" { | ||
return machinecontroller.InvalidMachineConfiguration("failure sending request for machine %s", s.scope.Machine.Name) | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are we going to see the actual error logged anywhere when this happens?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This error will be returned by reconciler's Create()
, I'd expect the machine controller to log it somewhere.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, wonder if there's any more information than Failure sending request
that we could extract to improve the UX?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Might be good to improve the logging if at all possible, non-blocking though
/approve
var detailedError autorest.DetailedError | ||
if errors.As(err, &detailedError) && detailedError.Message == "Failure sending request" { | ||
return machinecontroller.InvalidMachineConfiguration("failure sending request for machine %s", s.scope.Machine.Name) | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, wonder if there's any more information than Failure sending request
that we could extract to improve the UX?
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: JoelSpeed The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/retest |
/lgtm |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
2 similar comments
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
@alexander-demichev: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Bugzilla bug 1860229 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Fail machine if create request doesn't succeed.
For spot instances when the max price is lower than the current spot price, we should fail the machine. Currently, we are constantly trying to provision it. Azure error types are not great, so I think this is the cleanest way to fail machines.
This approach will also fail the machines in other cases like reaching quota limits.