Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Backport] [2.x] Update codecs to Apache Lucene 9.12.0 #199

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 20, 2024

Conversation

reta
Copy link
Collaborator

@reta reta commented Oct 15, 2024

Description

Backport of #198 to 2.x

Related Issues

Closes #197

Check List

  • New functionality includes testing.
  • New functionality has been documented.
  • API changes companion pull request created.
  • Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff.
  • Public documentation issue/PR created.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

reta added 2 commits October 15, 2024 11:35
Signed-off-by: Andriy Redko <andriy.redko@aiven.io>
Signed-off-by: Andriy Redko <andriy.redko@aiven.io>
@reta
Copy link
Collaborator Author

reta commented Oct 15, 2024

@sarthakaggarwal97 I have to bring #198 to 2.x first since 2.18.0 is on Apache Lucene 9.12.0. already (and BWC fails 2.x branch compilation)

Signed-off-by: Andriy Redko <andriy.redko@aiven.io>
Signed-off-by: Andriy Redko <andriy.redko@aiven.io>
@sarthakaggarwal97
Copy link
Collaborator

@reta looks good to me. Should we merge first to 2.x (since build is green here)?
@andrross any major comments on this PR before we merge?

@reta
Copy link
Collaborator Author

reta commented Oct 18, 2024

@reta looks good to me. Should we merge first to 2.x (since build is green here)?

Thanks @sarthakaggarwal97 , yes, we need 2.x first, thanks!

@sarthakaggarwal97 sarthakaggarwal97 merged commit 2afbadd into opensearch-project:2.x Oct 20, 2024
14 checks passed
@sarthakaggarwal97
Copy link
Collaborator

thanks @reta for the change

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants