Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Meta] Remote Store Performance Improvement #7380

Closed
5 tasks done
linuxpi opened this issue May 3, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed
5 tasks done

[Meta] Remote Store Performance Improvement #7380

linuxpi opened this issue May 3, 2023 · 3 comments
Labels
Storage:Durability Issues and PRs related to the durability framework v2.10.0

Comments

@linuxpi
Copy link
Collaborator

linuxpi commented May 3, 2023

Meta issue to keep track of Remote Store Performance improvement tasks

@linuxpi linuxpi added bug Something isn't working untriaged labels May 3, 2023
@gbbafna
Copy link
Collaborator

gbbafna commented May 3, 2023

Too many Translog files to delete after flush. This can happen if a successful flush happens after a while

This would get tackled in #7381

@sachinpkale sachinpkale added Storage:Durability Issues and PRs related to the durability framework v2.8.0 'Issues and PRs related to version v2.8.0' and removed bug Something isn't working untriaged labels May 4, 2023
@cwperks
Copy link
Member

cwperks commented May 24, 2023

@sachinpkale Is this on track for 2.8.0?

@linuxpi
Copy link
Collaborator Author

linuxpi commented Jun 14, 2023

@cwperks please remove 2.8 and add 2.9

@Bukhtawar Bukhtawar added v2.9.0 'Issues and PRs related to version v2.9.0' and removed v2.8.0 'Issues and PRs related to version v2.8.0' labels Jun 14, 2023
@dreamer-89 dreamer-89 added v2.10.0 and removed v2.9.0 'Issues and PRs related to version v2.9.0' labels Jul 19, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Storage:Durability Issues and PRs related to the durability framework v2.10.0
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants