-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Align KEM Combiner and drop ECDH-KEM CCA-conversion #161
Conversation
fluppe2
commented
Nov 28, 2024
- Modified KEM Combiner
- Dropped ECDH-KEM CCA-conversion
- Aligned security considerations
- Removed and added references appropriately
- Added Changelog under -07
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me, only some minor editorial comments.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In principle it's fine in my judgement, we should just decide on / process the open comments.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The PR looks good to me. I'll follow up on the list with a link to this PR
Co-authored-by: Johannes Roth <johannes.roth@mtg.de>
Co-authored-by: Johannes Roth <johannes.roth@mtg.de>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me, although I personally would prefer PK instead of P as that may be read as plaintext by some.
I agree with Andreas, it should better be "PK1" etc. |
Good catch, see 88d3fd1. |
Which also drops ECDH-KEM CCA-conversion. This variant is yet to be adopted under draft 7, hence official test vectors aren't available for now. See openpgp-pqc/draft-openpgp-pqc#161 .