-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 429
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow ProfileTypeBuilder to pass its three filters list to both implementations of ProfileType #4325
Open
obones
wants to merge
9
commits into
openhab:main
Choose a base branch
from
obones:4293-ProfileTypeBuilder_should_pass_all_lists
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+181
−81
Open
Allow ProfileTypeBuilder to pass its three filters list to both implementations of ProfileType #4325
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
a3fea88
Move getSupportedChannelTypeUIDs and getSupportedItemTypesOfChannel t…
obones 347fbe7
Use getSupportedChannelTypeUIDs and getSupportedItemTypesOfChannel on…
obones e092440
Introduce getSupportedChannelKind on ProfileType so that a given prof…
obones 7d37835
Must check for the channel kind supported by the profile type
obones e3052cc
Must not exit too early, both lists must be tested
obones 116046b
Use code similar to the one in ProfileTypeResource for better consist…
obones 86e6852
Improve the javadoc for ProfileType
obones ef03c14
Remove @Nullable on local variables
obones d0130fd
Rewrite the link() tests for better styling and make them similar to …
obones File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That looks really horrible. It would probably be better to
Why do you check
profileType.getSupportedItemTypesOfChannel
? A profile can change the item-type:Number:Dimensionless
) but can only be linked toDateTime
items. So a check would fail (in fact, currently the profile does not provide information about accepted channel types, so this will not cause an issue, but in principle it could).Number
, but the profileString
. In this case you could never link them.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree that it looks horrible, but it was jut to "fit in" with the already existing code.
As to why I do the check, well it's because I did a global search for the interface methods and made sure both methods are called in all the places where one was called following an
instanceof
call.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree, the style was not good before either and if you want to keep it: ok. But the
getSupportedItemTypesOfChannel
is excluding valid combinations.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm definitely in favor of changing the code style here, but as always when I'm submitting a pull request, I try to limit my changes to the code logic, adapting to the local style I encounter.
I'll try to come up with a more sensible way of writing this up.