ODH Image build actions

[z103cb]

What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR add's ODH workflows to build and publish to quay.io training operator images

**Which issue(s) this PR fixe
Fixes # https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHOAIENG-4838?filter=-1

Checklist:
Valided this work in my own fork, runs of this workflow can be seen here:

• release /tag based: https://github.com/z103cb/training-operator/actions/runs/8552572065
• push / pr based: https://github.com/z103cb/training-operator/actions/runs/8552491007

Images can be seen here:
https://quay.io/repository/laurentiu_bradin/training-operator?tab=tags

This workflow will need these secrets to be defined:

• QUAY_USERNAME -- quay user name
• QUAY_TOKEN -- quay encrypted token.
  Also this workflow will need this environment variable defined:
• QUAY_REPO_NAME -- quay namespace / repo

[anishasthana]

I think we can build solely for amd64 for now, to keep things simple. Thoughts?

[z103cb]

I think we can build solely for amd64 for now, to keep things simple. Thoughts?

The work is already done, I don't see any good reason (right now) as to why this would need to pulled out.

[zdtsw]

I think we can build solely for amd64 for now, to keep things simple. Thoughts?

The work is already done, I don't see any good reason (right now) as to why this would need to pulled out.

I think the idea is, we do not support any arch than x86_64 in ODH and RHOAI.
to add arm64 here can cause confusion.
Unless you want to run KFTO as an independent operator without ODH operator on arm64

[z103cb]

I think we can build solely for amd64 for now, to keep things simple. Thoughts?

The work is already done, I don't see any good reason (right now) as to why this would need to pulled out.

I think the idea is, we do not support any arch than x86_64 in ODH and RHOAI. to add arm64 here can cause confusion. Unless you want to run KFTO as an independent operator without ODH operator on arm64

I want to be able to run the training operator on OpenShift local on arm64. The fact none of the other operators support arm64 is RPITA and reduces the usability of a RH stack.

I feel very strongly about having this architecture being supported.

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 8600294475

Details

• 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall first build on odh_release_action at 42.877%

---

Totals
Change from base Build 8599984553:	42.9%
Covered Lines:	3753
Relevant Lines:	8753

---

💛 - Coveralls

[tedhtchang]

passed all checks /LGTM