Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Enable annotations using golangci-lint(gh action) #919

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 18, 2024

Conversation

AjayJagan
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes the gh action for linters to create annotations in the PR.

Description

The golangci-lint action was not creating annotations in the prs created. This is a fix for the issue.

JIRA issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHOAIENG-4526

How Has This Been Tested?

working ref: https://github.com/AjayJagan/opendatahub-operator/pull/10/files

Merge criteria:

  • The commits are squashed in a cohesive manner and have meaningful messages.
  • Testing instructions have been added in the PR body (for PRs involving changes that are not immediately obvious).
  • The developer has manually tested the changes and verified that the changes work

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from cam-garrison and rareddy March 15, 2024 10:12
@AjayJagan AjayJagan requested review from ykaliuta and removed request for rareddy and cam-garrison March 15, 2024 10:13
Copy link
Contributor

@bartoszmajsak bartoszmajsak left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am amazed that REPOSITORY settings was the culprit here :) Sounds like a bug of a golangci-lint-action, but if the fix on our end is to remove the cruft it's great! Great find!

LGTM

@AjayJagan
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@zdtsw
Copy link
Member

zdtsw commented Mar 15, 2024

I am amazed that REPOSITORY settings was the culprit here :) Sounds like a bug of a golangci-lint-action, but if the fix on our end is to remove the cruft it's great! Great find!

LGTM

i doubt the problem is in env REPOSITORY or maybe something else in their code
btw, should we use the latest v4(go lint) and v5(setup-go) now?

@AjayJagan
Copy link
Contributor Author

I am amazed that REPOSITORY settings was the culprit here :) Sounds like a bug of a golangci-lint-action, but if the fix on our end is to remove the cruft it's great! Great find!
LGTM

i doubt the problem is in env REPOSITORY or maybe something else in their code btw, should we use the latest v4(go lint) and v5(setup-go) now?

Hmm I don't know how it works internally though. 😅
I can upgrade to the latest versions

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm label Mar 15, 2024
@AjayJagan
Copy link
Contributor Author

@zdtsw updated the versions now :)

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Mar 15, 2024
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 15, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bartoszmajsak, zdtsw

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@AjayJagan
Copy link
Contributor Author

@zdtsw should we merge this?

@zdtsw zdtsw merged commit 06256fc into opendatahub-io:incubation Mar 18, 2024
7 of 8 checks passed
@AjayJagan AjayJagan deleted the fix-lint-action branch March 18, 2024 08:28
zdtsw referenced this pull request in zdtsw-forking/rhods-operator Mar 25, 2024
…services#919)

* fix: Enable annotations using golangci-lint(gh action)

* update versions
zdtsw referenced this pull request in red-hat-data-services/rhods-operator Mar 25, 2024
* feat(gh-action): ensures generated files are up-to-date in PR (#917)

* RHOAIENG-4433 Update readme/config files

* rework gh action based on comments

* feat(gh-action): ensures generated files are up-to-date in PR

* fix review comments

* reuse cmd

* fix(gen): upgrades to crd-ref-doc generator to latest version (#920)

fix(gen): upgrades to crd-ref-doc to latest version

- add "diff" in the failed GH action to help understand problem
- update: api doc

---------

Signed-off-by: Wen Zhou <wenzhou@redhat.com>

* fix: Enable annotations using golangci-lint(gh action) (#919)

* fix: Enable annotations using golangci-lint(gh action)

* update versions

* fix(make): cleans linter cache on clean (#922)

When juggling between branches golangci linter cache can have leftovers from the code that does not exist in the other branch.

This can lead to errors while running `make lint` as the linter tries to check cached sources first.

This change cleans the linter cache as part of the clean target to ensure consistency.

Here's an example of an invalid cache state leading to error:

```
WARN [runner] Can't process result by autogenerated_exclude processor: can't filter issue result.Issue{FromLinter:"ireturn", Text:"Entry returns interface (github.com/opendatahub-io/opendatahub-operator/v2/pkg/feature.DataProvider)", Severity:"", SourceLines:[]string(nil), Replacement:(*result.Replacement)(nil), Pkg:(*packages.Package)(0xc001343e00), LineRange:(*result.Range)(nil), Pos:token.Position{Filename:"/home/bartek/code/rhods/opendatahub-operator/incubation/pkg/feature/data_provider.go", Offset:1382, Line:45, Column:1}, HunkPos:0, ExpectNoLint:false, ExpectedNoLintLinter:""}: failed to get doc of file
```

* chore(Github): update issue template re-direct user for jira (#838)

* chore(Github): update issue template re-direct user for jira

Signed-off-by: Wen Zhou <wenzhou@redhat.com>

* Update .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.md

Co-authored-by: Ajay Jaganathan <36824134+AjayJagan@users.noreply.github.com>

* Update .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md

Co-authored-by: Ajay Jaganathan <36824134+AjayJagan@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Signed-off-by: Wen Zhou <wenzhou@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: Ajay Jaganathan <36824134+AjayJagan@users.noreply.github.com>

* chore: Small Makefile fixes (#928)

* Go back to using `IMG ?=` rather than forcing the value with `IMG =`. This makes it easier to override the value of `IMG` for development, and it also aligns it to how `BUNDLE_IMG` is assigned.
* Add `prepare` as dependency of the `undeploy` target. This is just for convenience, although when looking at the other targets, `prepare` may simply be a missing dependency in `undeploy`.

Signed-off-by: Edgar Hernández <23639005+israel-hdez@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(test): pin version not latest which just introduced to use go 1.22 (#934)

* fix(test): pin version not latest which just introduced to use go 1.22

Signed-off-by: Wen Zhou <wenzhou@redhat.com>

* update: code review

Signed-off-by: Wen Zhou <wenzhou@redhat.com>

---------

Signed-off-by: Wen Zhou <wenzhou@redhat.com>

---------

Signed-off-by: Wen Zhou <wenzhou@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Edgar Hernández <23639005+israel-hdez@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Ajay Jaganathan <36824134+AjayJagan@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Bartosz Majsak <bartosz.majsak@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Edgar Hernández <ehernand@redhat.com>
@bartoszmajsak bartoszmajsak mentioned this pull request Mar 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants