Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

certZ1.1/1.2-ClientCeritificatesTest revised #2662

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

priyacj
Copy link

@priyacj priyacj commented Feb 14, 2024

@priyacj priyacj requested a review from a team as a code owner February 14, 2024 17:32
@priyacj priyacj requested a review from a team February 14, 2024 17:32
@OpenConfigBot
Copy link

OpenConfigBot commented Feb 14, 2024

Pull Request Functional Test Report for #2662 / ab1858c

Virtual Devices

Device Test Test Documentation Job Raw Log
Arista cEOS status
# CERTZ-1: gNSI Client Certificate Tests
Cisco 8000E status
# CERTZ-1: gNSI Client Certificate Tests
Cisco XRd status
# CERTZ-1: gNSI Client Certificate Tests
Juniper ncPTX status
# CERTZ-1: gNSI Client Certificate Tests
Nokia SR Linux status
# CERTZ-1: gNSI Client Certificate Tests
Openconfig Lemming status
# CERTZ-1: gNSI Client Certificate Tests

Hardware Devices

Device Test Test Documentation Raw Log
Arista 7808 status
# CERTZ-1: gNSI Client Certificate Tests
Cisco 8808 status
# CERTZ-1: gNSI Client Certificate Tests
Juniper PTX10008 status
# CERTZ-1: gNSI Client Certificate Tests
Nokia 7250 IXR-10e status
# CERTZ-1: gNSI Client Certificate Tests

Help

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Feb 14, 2024

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 7909002133

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 51.783%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 7907656005: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 1641
Relevant Lines: 3169

💛 - Coveralls

@LimeHat
Copy link
Contributor

LimeHat commented Feb 14, 2024

I'm not sure why the new PR was needed (makes hard to track changes). But it doesn't look like this comment was incorporated #2488 (comment)

@priyacj
Copy link
Author

priyacj commented Feb 14, 2024

I'm not sure why the new PR was needed (makes hard to track changes). But it doesn't look like this comment was incorporated #2488 (comment)

@priyacj priyacj closed this Feb 14, 2024
@priyacj
Copy link
Author

priyacj commented Feb 14, 2024

I'm not sure why the new PR was needed (makes hard to track changes). But it doesn't look like this comment was incorporated #2488 (comment)

The test flow was fine with the new user credentials with admin privilege for new connection validation post rotating the certificates, without sharing the vendor credentials .

@priyacj priyacj reopened this Feb 15, 2024
@priyacj priyacj closed this Feb 15, 2024
@LimeHat
Copy link
Contributor

LimeHat commented Feb 15, 2024

The test flow was fine with the new user credentials with admin privilege for new connection validation post rotating the certificates, without sharing the vendor credentials .

I linked the other comment, not about the credentials :-)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants