You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am writing to report a persistent issue we have encountered in the latest version of XenaShiny (UCSCXenaShiny v2.0.0 based on UCSCXenaTools v1.4.8). Specifically, we are facing difficulties when executing gene signatures that include gene symbols with complex names. For example, the following gene signature: (ADAMTS16 + AGBL3 + DGCR6 + EXD3 + MAGI2 + PLG + RASGRF1 + RB1 + SNORD116-1 + SNURF + SPATA31D1 + ZFAT-AS1 + ZNF833P) results in errors.
We observed that each composed gene symbol (e.g., SNORD116-1, ZFAT-AS1, SPATA31D1) functions correctly when run individually. However, when combined into a signature, whether formatted with or without backticks (gene_symbol), the process fails. For instance:
(SPATA31D1 + ZNF833P): failed
(SPATA31D1 + ZNF833P): failed
(ZFAT-AS1 + SNORD116-1 + SPATA31D1): failed
These errors occur despite the gene symbols running effectively in isolation (e.g., methylation vs TMB correlation analyses). The problem persists even when gene symbols are formatted as previously required by earlier versions of XenaShiny, for example: (ZFAT-AS1 + SNORD116-1 + SPATA31D1).
This issue is significantly impacting our analysis and we would greatly appreciate your assistance in resolving it.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Best regards,
Enrique
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@quiquemedina Hi, I pushed a commit to fix this issue.
The reason why gene signature did not work is that the SPATA31D1 has 1 sample less than other two genes, so it raised error when combining the data with unequal size.
Uploading Gene signatures formatting recurrent running error with XenaShiny version updated.pdf…
Dear XenaShiny Developers,
I am writing to report a persistent issue we have encountered in the latest version of XenaShiny (UCSCXenaShiny v2.0.0 based on UCSCXenaTools v1.4.8). Specifically, we are facing difficulties when executing gene signatures that include gene symbols with complex names. For example, the following gene signature: (ADAMTS16 + AGBL3 + DGCR6 + EXD3 + MAGI2 + PLG + RASGRF1 + RB1 +
SNORD116-1
+ SNURF + SPATA31D1 +ZFAT-AS1
+ ZNF833P) results in errors.We observed that each composed gene symbol (e.g.,
SNORD116-1
,ZFAT-AS1
, SPATA31D1) functions correctly when run individually. However, when combined into a signature, whether formatted with or without backticks (gene_symbol
), the process fails. For instance:SPATA31D1
+ ZNF833P): failedZFAT-AS1
+SNORD116-1
+ SPATA31D1): failedThese errors occur despite the gene symbols running effectively in isolation (e.g., methylation vs TMB correlation analyses). The problem persists even when gene symbols are formatted as previously required by earlier versions of XenaShiny, for example: (
ZFAT-AS1
+SNORD116-1
+ SPATA31D1).This issue is significantly impacting our analysis and we would greatly appreciate your assistance in resolving it.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Best regards,
Enrique
![image](https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/39810494/287785163-75bf5c0b-4f80-4981-a5b1-991ab471b269.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.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.khJu1GBprsweaa-0qaonP3Nn_TXdnL-yeIEqEetM0WU)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: