Changes necessary to support protovalidate-java integration #211
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ogolberg
approved these changes
Dec 27, 2023
ogolberg
pushed a commit
to ogolberg/protokt
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 2, 2024
…st#211) - Fix generation for map entries for maps of presence-tracked primitives in proto2, e.g. `map<int32, int32>`. - Fix generation for maps with reserved names (e.g. `val`) - Fix full type name generation for nested messages - Add `KtProperty` annotation so that you can get a property's field number reflectively
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
map<int32, int32>.val)KtPropertyannotation so that you can get a property's field number reflectively