-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 20
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update to semantic-conventions 1.26.0 #73
Conversation
* | ||
* @deprecated Deprecated, use `messaging.client.id` instead. | ||
*/ | ||
@Deprecated |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Due to duplicate variable names, CI cannot pass😂.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
you could work around this by adding
{# deprecated messaging.client_id clashes with messaging.client.id #}
{%- if attribute.fqn != "messaging.client_id" %}
to
{% set attribute_const_name = attribute.fqn | to_const_name -%} |
@lmolkova is there a better solution for this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
check out open-telemetry/semantic-conventions#1031 and open-telemetry/semantic-conventions#1118
we may want to go ahead and implement option 2 from open-telemetry/semantic-conventions#1118 (but wait to merge it until that proposal is finalized)
I've added topic to today's Java SIG meeting to discuss
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
See #75 - we'll provide build-tool fix ASAP as we have a concensus
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Here's the change that drops problematic attribute - crossoverJie#1 (if Java SIG will accept it as a mitigation)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Here's the change that drops problematic attribute - crossoverJie#1 (if Java SIG will accept it as a mitigation)
Thank you for your work on this issue.
Drop messaging.client_id
Update to semantic-conventions 1.26.0