-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 446
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[SDK] Fix core dump issue in OTEL_INTERNAL_LOG_DISPATCH macro #2394
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Probably there is something I missed. What's is different behavior with this change?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I also didn't get the point, could you please explain this change?
To my understanding, C++ specifications will ensure the temporary object should be freed only after this code block(
Handle(...)
).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You're correct.
We've previously encountered a core dump caused by c_str(), similar to the situation described in https://stackoverflow.com/questions/27627413/why-does-calling-c-str-on-a-function-that-returns-a-string-not-work.
The code was as follows:
This caused
cstr
to become an invalid pointer passed into function f.However, in this case, Handle(level, FILE, LINE, tmp_stream.str().c_str(), attributes) is within a single expression, so this issue doesn't exist.
When I saw this core dump, my habitual aversion to the c_str() function led to a misjudgment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, in the example you shared and aslo the stackoverflow link, the temporary object returned from function reaches the end of its lifetime at the end of the including its expression, which means the temporary object is no longer valid after the ";", but the lifetime of local variable is different and will reach the end of current block, like @owent mentioend.