move internal/testdata to pdata/testdata

[codeboten]

This reduces dependencies from the consumer package while making testdata available across repos. It will allow us to remove duplicated code and its a fairly small surface area.

Fixes #9886

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 91.31%. Comparing base (79ccf55) to head (9712e96).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #9885   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.31%   91.31%           
=======================================
  Files         357      357           
  Lines       19202    19202           
=======================================
  Hits        17534    17534           
  Misses       1340     1340           
  Partials      328      328           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[mx-psi]

Is this going to be perma-unstable? If so, I would vote to have a different versioning schema like 0.0.x (I suggested that on #9209 (comment) but I haven't followed up on it)

[atoulme]

LGTM, I expect this package to become eventually stable though. There is no particular reason to not have it stable that I can think of.

[codeboten]

@mx-psi it could definitely be marked as stable, i just didn't know if it's something we would care to do. There isn't a large surface area, but since its mostly used for tests I wasn't sure if we want to make guarantees about its stability

[mx-psi]

@mx-psi it could definitely be marked as stable, i just didn't know if it's something we would care to do. There isn't a large surface area, but since its mostly used for tests I wasn't sure if we want to make guarantees about its stability

I wouldn't mind getting this to 1.x, it wouldn't be too bad to get a 2.x of this module if we ever need to, given there will be no non-test dependencies