-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Improvement] Improve digit_version & use it for version_checking #1185
[Improvement] Improve digit_version & use it for version_checking #1185
Conversation
need to resolve comments and fix CI |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1185 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 68.00% 68.28% +0.28%
==========================================
Files 160 160
Lines 10442 10519 +77
Branches 1902 1918 +16
==========================================
+ Hits 7101 7183 +82
+ Misses 2968 2958 -10
- Partials 373 378 +5
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
@ZwwWayne CI passed. |
Line 8 in 366c628
This line should also be replaced with digit_version
|
resolved |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
My sole interest is the test cases. They should be as complete as possible. Here are some idea sources: https://github.com/JuliaInterop/VersionParsing.jl/blob/master/test/runtests.jl |
Since we use the parse_version API from pkg_resources, the capability of |
That might be difficult because you need the entire commit history to make it possible. Besides, there is no guarantee that all commits are in linear (actually they can be parallel, it's not possible to determine the ranking in that case). |
No description provided.