Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Group iteration on simplifying principle wording #14
Group iteration on simplifying principle wording #14
Changes from 1 commit
d59305d
e60fbe4
c3fa5f9
e2e424c
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🤏
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@lloydchang Thanks!
Re #14 (review), I do personally agree the shorter and more memorable/catchy we can make these principle headers the better 🤏 🙂
I wonder though if "versioned" here is enough, whereas "version controlled" seems to me to check all the boxes of this principle. But do you not feel these have different meanings?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jlbutler
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jlbutler Updated the PR.
@heubeck thanks for this suggestion! I haven't added this to the branch yet because I think we'd need more discussion on that first. but I added you as co-author to this commit as well since you're collaborating with us here on GitHub. I'd like us to get this PR merged soon, but we can continue iterating. Are you free to join the next principles meeting on Wednesday?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@scottrigby Thank you, I'll try to participate.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Regarding my
audit-proof
suggestion: Technically it means the same as the phrases withimmutable
andversions
, but the statement is much stronger.Industries with deployment revision logging ("audit") demands may appreciate a less technical terminology.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@heubeck this is really interesting. Given how close this PR is to being merged for
v0.2.0
, and how important it is to simplify the headers ASAP, let's discuss this idea for a next iteration 🙏Would you be willing to move this idea to a discussion in the OpenGitOps project repo? That way there is a place for async discussion on this before and after the next meeting (tomorrow). The discussion could recommend this change from the current PR, and see how that sits with the principles committee and community?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Happy to discuss: open-gitops/project#15