Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix Resource Board Filtering Failure #9558

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 24, 2024
Merged

Conversation

nihal467
Copy link
Member

@nihal467 nihal467 commented Dec 24, 2024

Proposed Changes

  • Fixes #issue_number
  • Change 1
  • Change 2
  • More?

@ohcnetwork/care-fe-code-reviewers

Merge Checklist

  • Add specs that demonstrate bug / test a new feature.
  • Update product documentation.
  • Ensure that UI text is kept in I18n files.
  • Prep screenshot or demo video for changelog entry, and attach it to issue.
  • Request for Peer Reviews
  • Completion of QA

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Improved handling of query parameters for the infinite query mechanism in the Kanban section.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Enhanced query identification which may improve cache behavior and data fetching.

@nihal467 nihal467 requested a review from a team as a code owner December 24, 2024 10:40
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 24, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a modification to the KanbanSection component in the src/components/Kanban/Board.tsx file. The primary change involves extracting the options variable from the fetchOptions method and incorporating it into the queryKey of the useInfiniteQuery hook. This adjustment aims to enhance the query identification process, potentially impacting cache behavior and data fetching mechanisms while maintaining the overall component structure and error handling approach.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/components/Kanban/Board.tsx - Extracted options variable from fetchOptions method
- Updated useInfiniteQuery hook to include options.options?.query in queryKey

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

needs review, tested

Suggested reviewers

  • Jacobjeevan

Poem

🐰 In the realm of Kanban's dance,
A query key finds its new stance
Options extracted with care
Infinite scroll beyond compare
Code flows like a rabbit's leap
Through data's mysterious deep! 🚀


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3b8f7a4 and 4e5e64e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/components/Kanban/Board.tsx (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/components/Kanban/Board.tsx (2)

94-94: Ensure fetchOptions remains consistent across renders.

By extracting options outside of the fetchPage function, this change benefits clarity. However, if fetchOptions relies on props or other dynamic values, ensure changes to those values invalidate and refresh the query as expected. Consider wrapping options in a memoization hook if it must remain stable across renders.


120-120: Good use of queryKey for caching and refreshing logic.

Including options.options?.query in the query key helps React Query invalidate the cached data when the query parameters change. If fetchOptions might produce complex or large query objects, verify that it doesn’t negatively impact performance or lead to unintentionally frequent cache invalidations.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Dec 24, 2024

Deploy Preview for care-ohc ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 4e5e64e
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/care-ohc/deploys/676a8fbc75a70500088c9eb5
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-9558--care-ohc.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link

Deploying care-fe with  Cloudflare Pages  Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit: 4e5e64e
Status: ✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL: https://178a8c93.care-fe.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL: https://fix-resourceboard.care-fe.pages.dev

View logs

Copy link

cypress bot commented Dec 24, 2024

CARE    Run #4091

Run Properties:  status check passed Passed #4091  •  git commit 4e5e64e6de: Fix Resource Board Filtering Failure
Project CARE
Branch Review fix-resourceboard
Run status status check passed Passed #4091
Run duration 04m 16s
Commit git commit 4e5e64e6de: Fix Resource Board Filtering Failure
Committer Mohammed Nihal
View all properties for this run ↗︎

Test results
Tests that failed  Failures 0
Tests that were flaky  Flaky 0
Tests that did not run due to a developer annotating a test with .skip  Pending 0
Tests that did not run due to a failure in a mocha hook  Skipped 0
Tests that passed  Passing 135
View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/components/Kanban/Board.tsx (1)

Line range hint 94-120: Suggestions for improved robustness and performance

While the current implementation works, consider these improvements:

  1. Add error boundary or user-facing error state instead of just console.error
  2. Consider using suspense boundaries for loading states
  3. Memoize the options calculation to prevent unnecessary rerenders

Example implementation for memoizing options:

- const options = section.fetchOptions(section.id);
+ const options = useMemo(
+   () => section.fetchOptions(section.id),
+   [section.id, section.fetchOptions]
+ );
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3b8f7a4 and 4e5e64e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/components/Kanban/Board.tsx (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/components/Kanban/Board.tsx (1)

94-94: Performance optimization: Options calculation moved outside fetchPage

Good optimization to prevent redundant calculations of options on each page fetch. However, we should verify that section.fetchOptions doesn't depend on any mutable state that needs to be refreshed during pagination.

Let's verify the implementation of fetchOptions:

✅ Verification successful

Moving options calculation outside fetchPage is safe and beneficial

The verification shows that fetchOptions is a pure function that takes an id parameter and returns a query configuration object. Looking at the implementations in both ResourceBoard and ShiftingBoard, it simply constructs a query object with static route information and filters based on the section's id. Since it only depends on the section id which doesn't change during pagination, moving it outside fetchPage is a safe optimization that prevents unnecessary recalculations.

Examples from the codebase:

  • In ResourceBoard.tsx: fetchOptions creates a query with resource request status filter
  • In ShiftingBoard.tsx: fetchOptions creates a query with shift request status filter
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for implementations of fetchOptions to verify if they contain any mutable state
ast-grep --pattern 'fetchOptions: $_'

Length of output: 39


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find fetchOptions implementations
# First, let's search for files containing 'fetchOptions'
rg -l "fetchOptions"

# Then, let's see the actual implementation with context
rg "fetchOptions" -A 5 -B 5

Length of output: 4418

src/components/Kanban/Board.tsx Show resolved Hide resolved
@rithviknishad rithviknishad merged commit 6994b36 into develop Dec 24, 2024
61 checks passed
@rithviknishad rithviknishad deleted the fix-resourceboard branch December 24, 2024 10:58
Copy link

@nihal467 Your efforts have helped advance digital healthcare and TeleICU systems. 🚀 Thank you for taking the time out to make CARE better. We hope you continue to innovate and contribute; your impact is immense! 🙌

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants