Fix: Investigation record error in mobile mode #9065
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for care-ohc ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/components/Facility/Investigations/InvestigationSuggestions.tsx (2)
Line range hint
200-315: Consider enhancing mobile view accessibilityWhile the simplified mobile layout addresses the visibility issue, the removal of status indicators (missed/recorded) might impact user experience. Consider:
- Adding compact status indicators that maintain accessibility
- Including brief status text instead of tooltips
- Ensuring color isn't the only means of conveying status (for accessibility)
Example enhancement:
- return <li key={index}>{type}</li>; + return ( + <li key={index} className="flex items-center gap-2"> + <span>{type}</span> + {investigationMissed && ( + <span className="text-xs text-red-500">(Missed)</span> + )} + {investigated && !investigationMissed && ( + <span className="text-xs text-green-500">(Recorded)</span> + )} + </li> + );
203-203: Improve type safety for investigation time trackingThe
nextFurthestInvestigationis typed asany, which could lead to runtime errors. Consider using a more specific type.- let nextFurthestInvestigation: any = undefined; + let nextFurthestInvestigation: dayjs.Dayjs | undefined = undefined;
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/components/Facility/Investigations/InvestigationSuggestions.tsx(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/components/Facility/Investigations/InvestigationSuggestions.tsx (2)
200-200: LGTM: Improved data structure validation
The updated condition properly checks for the array property within the investigations object, fixing the issue where investigation suggestions weren't visible in mobile view.
Line range hint 200-315: Verify responsive behavior across breakpoints
The changes look good and address the visibility issue. Let's verify the responsive behavior across different screen sizes.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can see that the codebase extensively uses responsive design patterns with Tailwind CSS breakpoints (sm, md, lg, xl). The file InvestigationSuggestions.tsx specifically uses responsive classes to handle mobile view:
<div className="flex flex-col gap-4 md:hidden">
<table className="mt-3 hidden w-full rounded-xl bg-white shadow md:table">This shows that the component properly implements a mobile-first approach by:
- Showing a flex column layout on mobile devices
- Hiding the table on mobile and showing it only on medium (md) and larger screens
The responsive implementation looks correct and follows best practices
The changes successfully address the visibility issue in mobile view while maintaining proper responsive behavior across different screen sizes.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for responsive design implementation across the codebase
# Test 1: Verify consistent use of responsive classes
echo "Checking for responsive design patterns..."
rg -l "md:hidden|hidden md:" .
# Test 2: Check for potential responsive styling conflicts
echo "Checking for potential responsive styling conflicts..."
rg "hidden.*hidden" .
# Test 3: Verify mobile-first approach
echo "Checking mobile-first implementation..."
rg "sm:|md:|lg:|xl:" .
Length of output: 120218
|
LGTM |
|
@AdityaJ2305 Your efforts have helped advance digital healthcare and TeleICU systems. 🚀 Thank you for taking the time out to make CARE better. We hope you continue to innovate and contribute; your impact is immense! 🙌 |
Proposed Changes
@ohcnetwork/care-fe-code-reviewers
@nihal467
Merge Checklist
Screenshot
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor