Adding patient Id to props in Encounter Files #10745
Conversation
WalkthroughThe change updates the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant E as EncounterFilesTab
participant F as FilesTab
E->>F: Pass patientId (from props.patient.id)
F-->>E: Process patientId for logic/rendering
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for care-ohc ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/pages/Encounters/tabs/EncounterFilesTab.tsx (1)
7-12: Consider adding prop validation for patientId.Since patientId seems to be a required field for patient-related operations, consider adding runtime validation to ensure it's always present and valid.
You could add prop validation like this:
export const EncounterFilesTab = (props: EncounterTabProps) => { + if (!props.patient?.id) { + throw new Error('Patient ID is required for EncounterFilesTab'); + } return ( <FilesTab type="encounter" encounter={props.encounter} patientId={props.patient.id} subPage={props.subPage} /> ); };
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/pages/Encounters/tabs/EncounterFilesTab.tsx(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: cypress-run (1)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/pages/Encounters/tabs/EncounterFilesTab.tsx (1)
10-10:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify type safety for patient ID access.
While the change correctly adds the patient ID to props, we should ensure type safety when accessing
props.patient.id.Let's verify the type definitions:
Also, let's verify that FilesTab component expects this prop:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check type definitions for EncounterTabProps and patient property # Search for EncounterTabProps type definition ast-grep --pattern 'type EncounterTabProps = { $$$ }' # Search for interfaces that might extend EncounterTabProps ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ extends EncounterTabProps { $$$ }'Length of output: 129
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check FilesTab component's prop types # Search for FilesTab component's prop type definition ast-grep --pattern 'type $_ = { patientId: $_ $$$ }' # Alternative: Search for FilesTab component's interface ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ { patientId: $_ $$$ }'Length of output: 9583
Attention: Verify Patient ID Type Safety in EncounterFilesTab
- The update correctly passes
props.patient.idas thepatientIdprop to the FilesTab component.- Consistent patterns across the codebase indicate that
patientIdis expected to be a string.- However, our automated search for the
EncounterTabPropsdefinition did not return a result. Please manually confirm that thepatientproperty (and itsid) is properly typed (ideally as a string) within its type definition to ensure full type safety.
|
LGTM |
|
@Jacobjeevan Your efforts have helped advance digital healthcare and TeleICU systems. 🚀 Thank you for taking the time out to make CARE better. We hope you continue to innovate and contribute; your impact is immense! 🙌 |
Proposed Changes
@ohcnetwork/care-fe-code-reviewers
Merge Checklist
Summary by CodeRabbit