Update renovate config #10184
Update renovate config #10184
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for care-ohc ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
Deploying care-fe with
|
| Latest commit: |
9577db5
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://899df62e.care-fe.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://rithviknishad-chore-update-r.care-fe.pages.dev |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
renovate.json (1)
9-11: Consider review assignment strategy.While assigning a team is good for visibility, it might lead to notification spam. Consider these alternatives:
- Use
reviewersSampleSizeto randomly assign a subset of reviewers- Use
assigneesinstead if you want specific team members to be responsibleExample configuration:
"reviewers": [ "@ohcnetwork/care-fe-code-reviewers" ], +"reviewersSampleSize": 2,
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
renovate.json(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (10)
- GitHub Check: Redirect rules - care-ohc
- GitHub Check: Header rules - care-ohc
- GitHub Check: Pages changed - care-ohc
- GitHub Check: Test
- GitHub Check: auto-label
- GitHub Check: cypress-run (1)
- GitHub Check: lint
- GitHub Check: OSSAR-Scan
- GitHub Check: CodeQL-Build
- GitHub Check: OSSAR-Scan
🔇 Additional comments (2)
renovate.json (2)
6-8: LGTM! Good practice for PR categorization.The "dependencies" label will help in identifying and filtering dependency-related pull requests.
12-14: Verify the version bump strategy.Setting
bumpVersionto "minor" might be too aggressive for some dependencies. Consider:
- Using "patch" for safer automated updates
- Moving this to package-specific rules for more granular control
✅ Verification successful
Minor version bump strategy is appropriate for this React-based project ✅
The codebase primarily uses well-maintained React ecosystem packages that strictly follow semantic versioning. Minor version updates in these packages typically bring improvements and new features without breaking changes.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the repository's package.json for dependencies that might be sensitive to minor updates echo "Checking for sensitive dependencies (e.g., frameworks, build tools)..." find . -name "package.json" -not -path "*/node_modules/*" -exec jq -r '.dependencies + .devDependencies | keys[]' {} \; | sort -u | grep -E "react|vue|angular|webpack|babel|typescript"Length of output: 1462
| "packageRules": [ | ||
| { | ||
| "groupName": "all dependencies (minor, patch)", | ||
| "matchUpdateTypes": [ | ||
| "minor", | ||
| "patch" | ||
| ], | ||
| "matchCurrentVersion": "!/^0/", | ||
| "automerge": true | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add safeguards for automated merging.
While the current rules are reasonable, consider adding these safeguards:
stabilityDaysto ensure updates are stableprCreation: "not-pending"to wait for testsrequiredStatusChecksto ensure CI passes
{
"groupName": "all dependencies (minor, patch)",
"matchUpdateTypes": [
"minor",
"patch"
],
"matchCurrentVersion": "!/^0/",
- "automerge": true
+ "automerge": true,
+ "stabilityDays": 3,
+ "prCreation": "not-pending",
+ "requiredStatusChecks": ["build", "test"]
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| "packageRules": [ | |
| { | |
| "groupName": "all dependencies (minor, patch)", | |
| "matchUpdateTypes": [ | |
| "minor", | |
| "patch" | |
| ], | |
| "matchCurrentVersion": "!/^0/", | |
| "automerge": true | |
| } | |
| "packageRules": [ | |
| { | |
| "groupName": "all dependencies (minor, patch)", | |
| "matchUpdateTypes": [ | |
| "minor", | |
| "patch" | |
| ], | |
| "matchCurrentVersion": "!/^0/", | |
| "automerge": true, | |
| "stabilityDays": 3, | |
| "prCreation": "not-pending", | |
| "requiredStatusChecks": ["build", "test"] | |
| } |
CARE
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Project |
CARE
|
| Branch Review |
rithviknishad/chore/update-renovate-config
|
| Run status |
|
| Run duration | 03m 00s |
| Commit |
|
| Committer | Rithvik Nishad |
| View all properties for this run ↗︎ | |
| Test results | |
|---|---|
Failures
|
0
|
Flaky
|
0
|
Pending
|
0
|
Skipped
|
0
|
Passing
|
5
|
| View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎ | |
|
@rithviknishad Your efforts have helped advance digital healthcare and TeleICU systems. 🚀 Thank you for taking the time out to make CARE better. We hope you continue to innovate and contribute; your impact is immense! 🙌 |
Summary by CodeRabbit