-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Updated chainspec to be compatible with casper-execution-engine 7.0.3 #512
Conversation
Warning Rate limit exceeded@kubaplas has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 0 minutes and 55 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe changes involve updates to the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Auction
User->>Auction: Place Bid
Auction-->>User: Validate Bid
Auction->>Auction: Check Minimum Bid Amount
Auction->>Auction: Update Bid Costs
Auction-->>User: Confirm Bid Placement
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- odra-casper/test-vm/resources/chainspec.toml (4 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
odra-casper/test-vm/resources/chainspec.toml (2)
3-3
: Protocol version updated to 1.5.8.Updating the protocol version is a significant change. Please ensure:
- All nodes in the network are updated to this new version for compatibility.
- Thorough testing is done to verify that the new protocol version is compatible with all system components.
- Any potential breaking changes introduced by the new version are carefully evaluated and addressed.
74-74
: Newminimum_bid_amount
parameter introduced.The new
minimum_bid_amount
parameter sets a minimum allowed bid amount of 10 trillion motes. While having a minimum bid helps prevent spam bids, please verify that this chosen amount:
- Aligns with the expected use case and doesn't create too high of a barrier for participation.
- Has been thoughtfully decided based on factors like the total supply, expected number of validators, etc.
@@ -265,7 +267,7 @@ wasmless_transfer_cost = 100_000_000 | |||
[system_costs.auction_costs] | |||
get_era_validators = 10_000 | |||
read_seigniorage_recipients = 10_000 | |||
add_bid = 2_500_000_000 | |||
add_bid = 5_000_000_000_000 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
add_bid
cost increased drastically from 2.5 billion to 5 trillion motes.
This is a significant 1000x increase in the cost to add a bid. Such a drastic increase could severely impact validator participation in the auction.
Please carefully evaluate:
- The implications of this cost increase on the barrier to entry for validators and the potential impact on the overall health and decentralization of the network.
- Whether this change is intentional and what the rationale is behind it. It seems related to the high
minimum_bid_amount
introduced earlier. - If this might be a misconfiguration or an unintended consequence rather than a deliberate design choice.
I strongly recommend reassessing this cost increase and considering a more moderate value that balances spam prevention with reasonable validator participation costs.
fd0d1e8
to
4bb14c6
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/evaluate-benchmark.yml (1)
37-37
: LGTM!Updating the action version is a good practice to keep the workflow up-to-date.
As a best practice, please review the changelog of the
dawidd6/action-download-artifact
action to:
- Confirm compatibility of the
v4
version with your workflow.- Identify any relevant changes or enhancements that might benefit your use case.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- .github/workflows/evaluate-benchmark.yml (1 hunks)
- CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
- odra-casper/test-vm/resources/chainspec.toml (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- odra-casper/test-vm/resources/chainspec.toml
Additional comments not posted (2)
CHANGELOG.md (2)
10-11
: Verify the compatibility with the specified version of casper-execution-engine.Updating the
chainspec.toml
for compatibility with the latestcasper-execution-engine
is a critical change. Please provide the specific version of the execution engine that was tested against to validate the compatibility claims.Also, consider adding more details in the changelog about the nature of the compatibility changes made to the
chainspec.toml
file for better clarity.
8-9
: Provide more context on the motivation behind the Deployer implementation change.Moving the
Deployer
implementation fromHostRef
toOdraContract
is a significant architectural shift. Please provide more context on the rationale behind this change and how it improves the deployment process.Also, verify that:
- All necessary updates have been made across the codebase to handle this change.
- Relevant documentation and examples have been updated to reflect the new deployment approach.
To verify the impact of this change across the codebase, run the following script:
Verification successful
Deployment implementation change verified and properly implemented
The change mentioned in the CHANGELOG has been successfully implemented. The
Deployer
trait is now generically implemented for any type that implementsOdraContract
, rather than specifically forHostRef
. This change offers more flexibility in the deployment process and aligns well with theOdraContract
structure.Key points:
- The
Deployer
trait is defined incore/src/host.rs
.- There's a generic implementation
impl<R: OdraContract> Deployer<R> for R
.- No remaining implementations for
HostRef
were found.- Numerous examples and tests across the codebase use the new implementation.
To ensure completeness:
- Review the documentation to confirm it reflects this architectural change.
- Update any tutorials or guides that may reference the old
HostRef
-based deployment.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all occurrences of `Deployer` have been updated to the new implementation. # Test 1: Search for occurrences of `Deployer` with `HostRef`. Expect: No results. rg --type rust 'impl Deployer for HostRef' # Test 2: Search for occurrences of `Deployer` with `OdraContract`. Expect: Only valid usages. rg --type rust -A 5 'impl Deployer for OdraContract'Length of output: 99
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence and implementation of the Deployer trait # Test 1: Search for the Deployer trait definition echo "Searching for Deployer trait definition:" rg --type rust "trait Deployer" # Test 2: Look for any implementations of Deployer using a flexible pattern echo "Searching for Deployer implementations:" rg --type rust "impl .*Deployer" # Test 3: Check the extensions of Rust files in the project echo "Rust file extensions in the project:" fd -e rs --type f | sed -E 's/.*(\.[^.]+)$/\1/' | sort | uniq -c # Test 4: Search for any mentions of Deployer in the codebase echo "Mentions of Deployer in the codebase:" rg --type rust -i "deployer"Length of output: 7970
Updated github actions to use the latest version of artifact management actions.
4bb14c6
to
bb2b851
Compare
Benchmark report
|
Summary by CodeRabbit
Deployer
implementation to align withOdraContract
.