Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix/events and cep78 extensions #431

Merged
merged 49 commits into from
May 14, 2024
Merged

Conversation

zie1ony
Copy link
Contributor

@zie1ony zie1ony commented May 13, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced Address functionality to support serialization and deserialization, improving data handling and storage capabilities.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented May 13, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent update introduces serialization and deserialization capabilities to the Address enum in the core/src/address.rs file. This is achieved by adding the Serialize and Deserialize traits and adjusting the serde attributes to include untagged handling.

Changes

File Change Summary
core/src/address.rs Added Serialize and Deserialize traits to the Address enum and adjusted serde attributes.

In code's bright dance, new traits align,
Serialize, Deserialize, now combine.
The Address speaks in formats grand,
JSON and more, at our command.
🌟✨🐇


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 00c2d4f and c84726e.
Files selected for processing (17)
  • Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
  • core/src/contract_def.rs (1 hunks)
  • core/src/module.rs (1 hunks)
  • examples/Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
  • modules/Cargo.toml (2 hunks)
  • modules/src/cep78/tests/metadata.rs (5 hunks)
  • modules/src/cep78/token.rs (6 hunks)
  • odra-casper/proxy-caller/Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
  • odra-macros/src/ast/events_item.rs (4 hunks)
  • odra-macros/src/ast/odra_type_item.rs (3 hunks)
  • odra/Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
  • templates/blank/.gitignore (1 hunks)
  • templates/full/.gitignore (1 hunks)
  • templates/workspace/.gitignore (1 hunks)
  • templates/workspace/flapper/.gitignore (1 hunks)
  • templates/workspace/flipper/.gitignore (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (11)
  • examples/Cargo.toml
  • modules/Cargo.toml
  • modules/src/cep78/tests/metadata.rs
  • odra-casper/proxy-caller/Cargo.toml
  • odra-macros/src/ast/odra_type_item.rs
  • odra/Cargo.toml
  • templates/blank/.gitignore
  • templates/full/.gitignore
  • templates/workspace/.gitignore
  • templates/workspace/flapper/.gitignore
  • templates/workspace/flipper/.gitignore
Additional Context Used
LanguageTool (3)
README.md (3)

Near line 89: This sentence should probably be started with a verb instead of the noun ‘Checkout’. If not, consider inserting a comma for better clarity.
Context: ... assert!(contract.get()); } } ``` Checkout our [examples](https://github.com/odrad...


Near line 95: A comma might be missing here.
Context: ...dra features. ## Tests Before running tests make sure you have following packages i...


Near line 95: The article ‘the’ may be missing.
Context: ...Before running tests make sure you have following packages installed: - Rust toolchain (see [rust...

Additional comments not posted (9)
Cargo.toml (2)

19-19: Version update to 1.0.0-rc.1 aligns with the transition to a release candidate as mentioned in the summary.


26-32: All package versions updated to 1.0.0-rc.1 consistently. This change is crucial for maintaining version consistency across the project.

core/src/module.rs (1)

66-68: Addition of event_schemas() to HasEvents for SubModule<M> enhances event schema functionality within modules, aligning with the PR's objectives to improve event handling.

README.md (1)

14-14: Updated GitHub Actions workflow status badge URL to reflect the new release branch. This change is consistent with the PR's objectives.

core/src/contract_def.rs (1)

Line range hint 66-68: Removal of the #[cfg(target_arch = "wasm32")] attribute from event_schemas() function allows it to be used in more general contexts, not limited to the wasm32 architecture. This change supports the PR's goal of enhancing event schema functionality.

odra-macros/src/ast/events_item.rs (1)

Line range hint 1-757: The changes in this file support the enhancements in event handling by providing macro implementations for HasEvents. This aligns with the PR's objectives to improve event schema functionality.

modules/src/cep78/token.rs (3)

320-320: Refactoring of the burn function to use burn_token_unchecked improves modularity and reusability of the burning logic.


Line range hint 487-502: Introduction of set_token_metadata_unchecked for updating token metadata without ownership checks enhances flexibility in metadata management.


741-765: Addition of token_exists_by_hash and set_token_metadata_unchecked functions supports the PR's objectives to improve module functionality by providing more granular control over token properties.

Copy link

Benchmark report

Action Details Gas diff
Wasm Deploy Filename: Benchmark.wasm 🔴 +0.936598586 CSPR (0.60%)
Contract Call Entry point: init_submodule 🔴 +0.00003859 CSPR (0.00%)
Contract Call Entry point: emit_event 🔴 +0.00003859 CSPR (0.03%)

Copy link
Contributor

@kpob kpob left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My only concern is the updated burn implementation calls owner_of twice (first time in burn second in unchecked_burn). The library implementation should as efficient as possible so we should avoid reading data multiple times.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c84726e and bea1ee5.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • modules/src/cep78/token.rs (6 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
modules/src/cep78/token.rs (1)

747-750: Verify the correctness of the token_exists_by_hash method.

Comment on lines +320 to +322
// NOTE: Bellow code is almost the same as in `burn_token_unchecked`
// function, but it is copied here to avoid checking owner twice.
self.ensure_burnable();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider refactoring to avoid code duplication in the burn method.

The comment in the code suggests that the logic in the burn method is almost identical to that in burn_token_unchecked, but duplicated to avoid checking the owner twice. This could be optimized by refactoring the common logic into a separate method that both functions can call, potentially with a parameter to skip certain checks when necessary.

Comment on lines +753 to +761
pub fn set_token_metadata_unchecked(&mut self, token_id: &String, token_meta_data: String) {
self.metadata
.ensure_mutability(CEP78Error::ForbiddenMetadataUpdate);
self.metadata.update_or_revert(&token_meta_data, token_id);
self.emit_ces_event(MetadataUpdated::new(
String::from(token_id),
token_meta_data
));
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ensure metadata updates are correctly handled.

The method set_token_metadata_unchecked updates the metadata without an ownership check, which could lead to unauthorized changes. It's crucial to ensure that this method is only called in contexts where such checks have already been performed or are explicitly not required. Consider adding additional safeguards or documentation to clarify the intended use and restrictions of this method.

Comment on lines +764 to +771
pub fn burn_token_unchecked(&mut self, token_id: String, burner: Address) {
self.ensure_burnable();
let token_owner = self.owner_of_by_id(&token_id);
self.ensure_not_burned(&token_id);
self.data.mark_burnt(&token_id);
self.data.decrement_counter(&token_owner);
self.emit_ces_event(Burn::new(token_owner, token_id, burner));
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Optimize the burn_token_unchecked method to prevent potential security risks.

The burn_token_unchecked method performs the burning of a token without an ownership check. While this might be intended for internal use where such checks are handled elsewhere, it's important to ensure that this method cannot be misused. Consider adding explicit documentation or access restrictions to make the usage context clear and secure.

Copy link

Benchmark report

Action Details Gas diff
Wasm Deploy Filename: Benchmark.wasm 🔴 +0.936598586 CSPR (0.60%)
Contract Call Entry point: init_submodule 🔴 +0.00003859 CSPR (0.00%)
Contract Call Entry point: emit_event 🔴 +0.00003859 CSPR (0.03%)

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between bea1ee5 and 996b59e.
Files selected for processing (2)
  • core/Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
  • core/src/address.rs (1 hunks)
Files not reviewed due to errors (1)
  • core/src/address.rs (no review received)
Additional comments not posted (1)
core/Cargo.toml (1)

15-15: The configuration for the serde dependency is well-set to optimize for workspace usage and specific feature enablement.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 996b59e and bbe7cd1.
Files selected for processing (2)
  • Cargo.toml (2 hunks)
  • core/src/address.rs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • Cargo.toml
  • core/src/address.rs

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between bbe7cd1 and bf94b08.
Files selected for processing (48)
  • core/Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
  • core/src/call_def.rs (1 hunks)
  • core/src/contract_def.rs (8 hunks)
  • core/src/gas_report.rs (1 hunks)
  • examples/resources/casper_contract_schemas/balance_checker_schema.json (1 hunks)
  • examples/resources/casper_contract_schemas/cross_contract_schema.json (1 hunks)
  • examples/resources/casper_contract_schemas/dog_contract2_schema.json (1 hunks)
  • examples/resources/casper_contract_schemas/dog_contract3_schema.json (1 hunks)
  • examples/resources/casper_contract_schemas/dog_contract_schema.json (1 hunks)
  • examples/resources/casper_contract_schemas/host_contract_schema.json (1 hunks)
  • examples/resources/casper_contract_schemas/livenet_contract_schema.json (1 hunks)
  • examples/resources/casper_contract_schemas/math_engine_schema.json (1 hunks)
  • examples/resources/casper_contract_schemas/mock_moderated_schema.json (1 hunks)
  • examples/resources/casper_contract_schemas/modules_contract_schema.json (1 hunks)
  • examples/resources/casper_contract_schemas/my_contract_schema.json (1 hunks)
  • examples/resources/casper_contract_schemas/nested_odra_types_contract_schema.json (1 hunks)
  • examples/resources/casper_contract_schemas/owned_contract_schema.json (1 hunks)
  • examples/resources/casper_contract_schemas/owned_token_schema.json (1 hunks)
  • examples/resources/casper_contract_schemas/party_contract_schema.json (1 hunks)
  • examples/resources/casper_contract_schemas/pauseable_counter_schema.json (1 hunks)
  • examples/resources/casper_contract_schemas/public_wallet_schema.json (1 hunks)
  • examples/resources/casper_contract_schemas/reentrancy_mock_schema.json (1 hunks)
  • examples/resources/casper_contract_schemas/signature_verifier_schema.json (1 hunks)
  • examples/resources/casper_contract_schemas/testing_contract_schema.json (1 hunks)
  • examples/resources/casper_contract_schemas/time_lock_wallet_schema.json (1 hunks)
  • examples/resources/casper_contract_schemas/token_manager_schema.json (1 hunks)
  • examples/resources/casper_contract_schemas/token_schema.json (1 hunks)
  • examples/resources/legacy/my_contract_schema.json (1 hunks)
  • modules/resources/casper_contract_schemas/cep18_client_contract_schema.json (1 hunks)
  • modules/resources/casper_contract_schemas/cep18_schema.json (1 hunks)
  • modules/resources/casper_contract_schemas/cep78_schema.json (1 hunks)
  • modules/resources/casper_contract_schemas/erc1155_receiver_schema.json (2 hunks)
  • modules/resources/casper_contract_schemas/erc1155_token_schema.json (2 hunks)
  • modules/resources/casper_contract_schemas/erc20_schema.json (2 hunks)
  • modules/resources/casper_contract_schemas/erc721_receiver_schema.json (2 hunks)
  • modules/resources/casper_contract_schemas/erc721_token_schema.json (2 hunks)
  • modules/resources/casper_contract_schemas/mock_contract_schema.json (1 hunks)
  • modules/resources/casper_contract_schemas/mock_dummy_contract_schema.json (1 hunks)
  • modules/resources/casper_contract_schemas/mock_transfer_filter_contract_schema.json (1 hunks)
  • modules/resources/casper_contract_schemas/ownable2_step_schema.json (2 hunks)
  • modules/resources/casper_contract_schemas/ownable_schema.json (2 hunks)
  • modules/resources/casper_contract_schemas/wrapped_native_token_schema.json (2 hunks)
  • modules/resources/legacy/cep18_client_contract_schema.json (1 hunks)
  • modules/resources/legacy/cep18_schema.json (1 hunks)
  • modules/resources/legacy/cep78_schema.json (1 hunks)
  • modules/resources/legacy/mock_contract_schema.json (1 hunks)
  • modules/resources/legacy/mock_dummy_contract_schema.json (1 hunks)
  • modules/resources/legacy/mock_transfer_filter_contract_schema.json (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (28)
  • examples/resources/casper_contract_schemas/balance_checker_schema.json
  • examples/resources/casper_contract_schemas/cross_contract_schema.json
  • examples/resources/casper_contract_schemas/dog_contract2_schema.json
  • examples/resources/casper_contract_schemas/dog_contract3_schema.json
  • examples/resources/casper_contract_schemas/dog_contract_schema.json
  • examples/resources/casper_contract_schemas/host_contract_schema.json
  • examples/resources/casper_contract_schemas/livenet_contract_schema.json
  • examples/resources/casper_contract_schemas/math_engine_schema.json
  • examples/resources/casper_contract_schemas/modules_contract_schema.json
  • examples/resources/casper_contract_schemas/nested_odra_types_contract_schema.json
  • examples/resources/casper_contract_schemas/owned_contract_schema.json
  • examples/resources/casper_contract_schemas/owned_token_schema.json
  • examples/resources/casper_contract_schemas/party_contract_schema.json
  • examples/resources/casper_contract_schemas/pauseable_counter_schema.json
  • examples/resources/casper_contract_schemas/public_wallet_schema.json
  • examples/resources/casper_contract_schemas/reentrancy_mock_schema.json
  • examples/resources/casper_contract_schemas/signature_verifier_schema.json
  • examples/resources/casper_contract_schemas/testing_contract_schema.json
  • examples/resources/casper_contract_schemas/time_lock_wallet_schema.json
  • examples/resources/casper_contract_schemas/token_manager_schema.json
  • examples/resources/casper_contract_schemas/token_schema.json
  • modules/resources/casper_contract_schemas/erc1155_receiver_schema.json
  • modules/resources/casper_contract_schemas/erc1155_token_schema.json
  • modules/resources/casper_contract_schemas/erc721_receiver_schema.json
  • modules/resources/casper_contract_schemas/ownable2_step_schema.json
  • modules/resources/casper_contract_schemas/ownable_schema.json
  • modules/resources/casper_contract_schemas/wrapped_native_token_schema.json
  • modules/resources/legacy/mock_dummy_contract_schema.json
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • core/Cargo.toml
Additional comments not posted (36)
modules/resources/legacy/mock_transfer_filter_contract_schema.json (1)

1-30: The schema structure and definitions appear consistent and correct.

modules/resources/casper_contract_schemas/mock_dummy_contract_schema.json (1)

1-41: The contract schema includes detailed metadata and contract information, which aligns with the updates mentioned in the AI-generated summary.

examples/resources/legacy/my_contract_schema.json (1)

1-75: The contract schema is well-defined with clear entry points and argument specifications. It aligns with the expected structure for a contract schema.

modules/resources/casper_contract_schemas/mock_transfer_filter_contract_schema.json (1)

1-67: The contract schema is comprehensive, including detailed entry point definitions and additional attributes like "is_contract_context" and "access", which are correctly set.

core/src/gas_report.rs (1)

6-6: Serialization traits added to the DeployReport enum enhance its usability in contexts where JSON or other forms of serialization are required.

core/src/call_def.rs (1)

4-4: The addition of serialization traits to the CallDef struct is appropriate, facilitating the transmission of call definitions over networks or their storage in a serialized form.

modules/resources/legacy/cep18_client_contract_schema.json (1)

1-172: The contract schema is comprehensive, covering various aspects of token interaction such as balance checks, allowances, and transfers. It is well-structured and aligns with standard practices in token management.

modules/resources/legacy/mock_contract_schema.json (1)

1-227: The mock contract schema is detailed and correctly defines various functionalities expected in a token management system. It includes comprehensive entry points for operations like minting, burning, and transferring.

examples/resources/casper_contract_schemas/mock_moderated_schema.json (2)

3-3: Updated toolchain version to rustc 1.78.0-nightly. This ensures compatibility with the latest features and fixes.


8-8: Updated contract version to 1.0.0-rc.1, aligning with the move towards a release candidate version.

modules/resources/casper_contract_schemas/cep18_client_contract_schema.json (4)

3-3: Updated toolchain version to rustc 1.78.0-nightly. This ensures compatibility with the latest features and fixes.


4-7: Updated authors list to include new contributors, reflecting current team composition.


9-9: Updated repository URL to https://github.com/odradev/odra, ensuring it points to the correct location.


12-12: Updated contract version to 1.0.0-rc.1, aligning with the move towards a release candidate version.

examples/resources/casper_contract_schemas/my_contract_schema.json (2)

3-3: Updated toolchain version to rustc 1.78.0-nightly. This ensures compatibility with the latest features and fixes.


8-8: Updated contract version to 1.0.0-rc.1, aligning with the move towards a release candidate version.

modules/resources/casper_contract_schemas/mock_contract_schema.json (4)

3-3: Updated toolchain version to rustc 1.78.0-nightly. This ensures compatibility with the latest features and fixes.


4-7: Updated authors list to include new contributors, reflecting current team composition.


9-9: Updated repository URL to https://github.com/odradev/odra, ensuring it points to the correct location.


12-12: Updated contract version to 1.0.0-rc.1, aligning with the move towards a release candidate version.

core/src/contract_def.rs (4)

12-12: Added Serialize and Deserialize traits to the Entrypoint structure, enhancing its usability in serialization contexts.


29-29: Added Serialize and Deserialize traits to the Argument structure, aligning it with modern data handling practices.


44-44: Enhanced the Event structure with Serialize and Deserialize traits to support effective event management and utilization.


Line range hint 60-69: Added Serialize and Deserialize traits to EntrypointType and EntrypointAttribute enums, enhancing flexibility and robustness in their handling.

modules/resources/casper_contract_schemas/erc20_schema.json (2)

3-3: Updated toolchain version to rustc 1.78.0-nightly. This ensures compatibility with the latest features and fixes.


12-12: Updated contract version to 1.0.0-rc.1, aligning with the move towards a release candidate version.

modules/resources/casper_contract_schemas/erc721_token_schema.json (2)

3-3: Updated toolchain version to rustc 1.78.0-nightly. Ensure this version is compatible with other project dependencies.


12-12: Updated contract version to 1.0.0-rc.1. Confirm that this aligns with the project's release strategy and other module versions.

Verification successful

The verification of the contract version 1.0.0-rc.1 in erc721_token_schema.json shows that it aligns with the majority of other modules in the project, which also use the version 1.0.0-rc.1. The only exception is cep78_schema.json, which uses version 1.5.1. This suggests that the update to 1.0.0-rc.1 in erc721_token_schema.json is consistent with the project's general release strategy.

  • Consistent Versions:

    • wrapped_native_token_schema.json
    • ownable_schema.json
    • ownable2_step_schema.json
    • mock_transfer_filter_contract_schema.json
    • mock_dummy_contract_schema.json
    • mock_contract_schema.json
    • erc721_token_schema.json
    • erc721_receiver_schema.json
    • erc20_schema.json
    • erc1155_token_schema.json
    • erc1155_receiver_schema.json
    • cep18_schema.json
    • cep18_client_contract_schema.json
  • Exception:

    • cep78_schema.json uses version 1.5.1.
Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify consistency of contract version with other modules.

# Test: Search for other contract versions in the project.
rg --type json $'contract_version' modules/resources/**/*.json

Length of output: 3183

modules/resources/casper_contract_schemas/cep18_schema.json (2)

2-12: Ensure the contract version aligns with project standards.


3-3: Update the toolchain version if newer stable releases are available.

modules/resources/legacy/cep78_schema.json (3)

2-2: Confirm that the legacy status of the 'Cep78' contract is intentional and documented.


200-243: Ensure that all required fields are indeed necessary and consider making optional if not.


401-426: Review the mutability of the 'mint' function to ensure it aligns with contract security policies.

modules/resources/casper_contract_schemas/cep78_schema.json (3)

3-3: Update to toolchain version noted.


12-12: Update to contract version noted.


1-1174: Ensure all structural changes in the JSON schema are consistent with the contract's requirements and intended functionality.

Verification successful

The JSON schema in cep78_schema.json appears to be consistent with the contract's requirements. The detailed elements and their properties within the "types", "entry_points", and "events" sections match the expected types and structures typically required for contract functionality.

  • Types: Structs and enums are defined with appropriate properties and types.
  • Entry Points: Methods are listed with descriptions, mutability flags, and argument specifications.
  • Events: Contract events are properly declared with corresponding types.

This structure supports the intended functionality of the contract as per the schema definitions provided.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the JSON schema changes are consistent with the contract's requirements.

# Test: Check for consistency in the JSON schema structure.
rg --type json --json $'type' modules/resources/casper_contract_schemas/cep78_schema.json

Length of output: 996



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify detailed elements and their properties in the JSON schema.

# Check for specific elements and their properties in the JSON schema to ensure they match the expected types and structures.
rg --json -A 5 'types|entry_points|events' modules/resources/casper_contract_schemas/cep78_schema.json

Length of output: 5948

{
"struct": {
"name": "Burn",
"description": null,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider providing a description for better clarity and documentation.

- "description": null,
+ "description": "Defines the burn operation for tokens.",

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change
"description": null,
"description": "Defines the burn operation for tokens.",

Comment on lines +510 to +511
"wasm_file_name": "Cep18.wasm",
"description": "Initializes the contract with the given metadata, initial supply, security and modality.",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ensure the description is comprehensive and covers all aspects of the contract initialization.

- "description": "Initializes the contract with the given metadata, initial supply, security and modality.",
+ "description": "Initializes the contract with the given metadata, initial supply, security settings, and operational modality, ensuring full configurability at deployment.",

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change
"wasm_file_name": "Cep18.wasm",
"description": "Initializes the contract with the given metadata, initial supply, security and modality.",
"wasm_file_name": "Cep18.wasm",
"description": "Initializes the contract with the given metadata, initial supply, security settings, and operational modality, ensuring full configurability at deployment.",

Comment on lines +1 to +559
"name": "transfer",
"args": [
{
"name": "recipient",
"ty": "Key",
"is_ref": false,
"is_slice": false,
"is_required": true
},
{
"name": "amount",
"ty": "U256",
"is_ref": false,
"is_slice": false,
"is_required": true
}
],
"is_mutable": true,
"return_ty": "Unit",
"ty": "Public",
"attributes": []
},
{
"name": "transfer_from",
"args": [
{
"name": "owner",
"ty": "Key",
"is_ref": false,
"is_slice": false,
"is_required": true
},
{
"name": "recipient",
"ty": "Key",
"is_ref": false,
"is_slice": false,
"is_required": true
},
{
"name": "amount",
"ty": "U256",
"is_ref": false,
"is_slice": false,
"is_required": true
}
],
"is_mutable": true,
"return_ty": "Unit",
"ty": "Public",
"attributes": []
},
{
"name": "mint",
"args": [
{
"name": "owner",
"ty": "Key",
"is_ref": false,
"is_slice": false,
"is_required": true
},
{
"name": "amount",
"ty": "U256",
"is_ref": false,
"is_slice": false,
"is_required": true
}
],
"is_mutable": true,
"return_ty": "Unit",
"ty": "Public",
"attributes": []
},
{
"name": "burn",
"args": [
{
"name": "owner",
"ty": "Key",
"is_ref": false,
"is_slice": false,
"is_required": true
},
{
"name": "amount",
"ty": "U256",
"is_ref": false,
"is_slice": false,
"is_required": true
}
],
"is_mutable": true,
"return_ty": "Unit",
"ty": "Public",
"attributes": []
}
]
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tip

Codebase Verification

The Cep18 schema is consistent in terms of functionality with other contract schemas like ERC20 and ERC721. However, it lacks the detailed metadata and descriptions found in these newer schemas. This includes missing information about authors, repository links, and detailed descriptions for fields and types. It is recommended to update the Cep18 schema to include this additional metadata to align with the current project standards.

  • Update the Cep18 schema to include metadata such as authors, repository, and toolchain.
  • Add detailed descriptions for fields and types to enhance clarity and maintainability.
Analysis chain

Review the entire schema for consistency and correctness. Ensure all types, required fields, and event definitions align with the project's standards and the intended functionality of the Cep18 contract.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the consistency of the Cep18 schema with project standards.

# Test: Compare this schema with other contract schemas in the project for consistency.
rg --type json $'contract_schema' modules/resources/**/*.json

Length of output: 3229



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Extract the content of Cep18 schema and a couple of other representative schemas for comparison.
cat modules/resources/legacy/cep18_schema.json
cat modules/resources/casper_contract_schemas/erc20_schema.json
cat modules/resources/casper_contract_schemas/erc721_token_schema.json

Length of output: 32153

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between bf94b08 and 6414984.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • core/src/address.rs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • core/src/address.rs

Copy link

Benchmark report

Action Details Gas diff
Wasm Deploy Filename: Benchmark.wasm 🔴 +0.95000963 CSPR (0.61%)
Contract Call Entry point: init_submodule 🔴 +0.00003859 CSPR (0.00%)
Contract Call Entry point: emit_event 🔴 +0.00003859 CSPR (0.03%)

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6414984 and 84893d7.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • core/src/address.rs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • core/src/address.rs

@zie1ony zie1ony merged commit 4b4a1ca into release/1.0.0 May 14, 2024
4 of 5 checks passed
@zie1ony zie1ony deleted the fix/events-and-cep78-extensions branch May 14, 2024 08:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants