Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Node.js readme to avoid confusion #13

Closed
wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

fhinkel
Copy link
Member

@fhinkel fhinkel commented Jul 25, 2017

We want to make sure nobody confuses this repo with the main repo.

Ref: #6

Any feelings on whether it's OK to delete the original Readme? Should we keep it and just prefix it with the explanation?

nodejs-ci and others added 6 commits July 25, 2017 05:55
Major V8 updates are usually API/ABI incompatible with previous
versions. This commit adapts NODE_MODULE_VERSION for V8 6.2.

Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/CTC/blob/master/meetings/2016-09-28.md
regress/regress-crbug-514081 allocates a 2G block of memory
and if there  are multiple variants running at the
same time this can lead to crashes, OOM kills or
the OS failing to allocate memory.  This patch
limits us to running a single variant of the test

Fixes: nodejs/node#6340
PR-URL: nodejs/node#6678
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <fedor@indutny.com>
VS2013 does not support defaulting move constructor and assignment
operator. This adds explicit definitions of those methods for two
classes.
This fix is required because we still support building addons with
VS2013 and the incompatibility is in v8.h.

Fixes: nodejs#4

PR-URL: nodejs/node#13263
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: Franziska Hinkelmann <franziska.hinkelmann@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <myles.borins@gmail.com>
@targos
Copy link
Member

targos commented Jul 25, 2017

I think it's OK to delete the README but it has to be done in the update script, somehow. This branch is overwritten by it.

@targos
Copy link
Member

targos commented Jul 25, 2017

What we can do is discuss here about the contents and I'll add a step to the script that replaces the readme with it.

@fhinkel
Copy link
Member Author

fhinkel commented Jul 25, 2017

Sounds good!

@fhinkel fhinkel requested a review from Fishrock123 July 25, 2017 11:52
README.md Outdated
<a title="CII Best Practices" href="https://bestpractices.coreinfrastructure.org/projects/29"><img src="https://bestpractices.coreinfrastructure.org/projects/29/badge"></a>
</p>
This is a mirror of [Node.js](https://github.com/nodejs/node)
with V8 Tip-of-Tree.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd explicitly call this out as experimental:

This is an automatically updated experimental version of Node.js with V8 Tip-of-Tree embedded.

LGTM either way though.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, that's a great suggestions.

@nodejs-ci nodejs-ci force-pushed the canary branch 6 times, most recently from 04083a9 to 4769085 Compare August 1, 2017 05:56
We want to make sure nobody confuses this repo with the main repo.

Ref: nodejs#6
@nodejs-ci nodejs-ci force-pushed the canary branch 2 times, most recently from 504d70a to 0edb9cf Compare August 3, 2017 05:56
@targos targos changed the base branch from canary to readme August 3, 2017 08:54
@targos
Copy link
Member

targos commented Aug 3, 2017

Thank you @fhinkel I landed this on a new branch called readme so we can use pull requests to update the text.
I'm changing the update script to get the contents from there right now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants