Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: add a GitHub workflow to test a module with CITGM #849

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Mar 7, 2021

Conversation

targos
Copy link
Member

@targos targos commented Mar 5, 2021

Form:

image

Example run on my fork with lodash module: https://github.com/targos/citgm/actions/runs/623994089

Another example with:

@targos targos mentioned this pull request Mar 5, 2021
4 tasks
Copy link
Member

@richardlau richardlau left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there an at-a-glance way to see the parameters that were used to start the runs?

@targos
Copy link
Member Author

targos commented Mar 5, 2021

Is there an at-a-glance way to see the parameters that were used to start the runs?

I haven't found anything in the GitHub UI.
We could hack something with a no-op job whose name contains the parameters. WDYT?

@richardlau
Copy link
Member

Is there an at-a-glance way to see the parameters that were used to start the runs?

I haven't found anything in the GitHub UI.
We could hack something with a no-op job whose name contains the parameters. WDYT?

SGTM.

@targos
Copy link
Member Author

targos commented Mar 5, 2021

https://github.com/targos/citgm/actions/runs/624243277

image

image

@codecov-io

This comment has been minimized.

@targos
Copy link
Member Author

targos commented Mar 6, 2021

/cc @nodejs/citgm

@targos targos merged commit 3a9a325 into nodejs:main Mar 7, 2021
@targos targos deleted the test-module-workflow branch March 7, 2021 09:48
@targos
Copy link
Member Author

targos commented Mar 7, 2021

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants