Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dev -> Master for v3.2 release #657

Merged
merged 66 commits into from
Jun 18, 2021
Merged

Dev -> Master for v3.2 release #657

merged 66 commits into from
Jun 18, 2021

Conversation

drpatelh
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

drpatelh and others added 30 commits May 13, 2021 14:29
Bump pipeline version to 3.2dev
This script will fail if only one sample is provided as R drops the matrix to a vector if not `drop=FALSE` is given.
Fix pipeline if only one sample is provided
Re-write SRA download workflow to accept --ena_metadata_fields parameter
drpatelh and others added 2 commits June 17, 2021 13:45
Added stand-alone executable to auto-create samplesheet from a directory of FastQ files
@drpatelh drpatelh marked this pull request as ready for review June 17, 2021 16:47
Add salmon_quant_libtype parameter
Copy link
Member

@maxulysse maxulysse left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Most of @grst comments are on point, and I'm afraid I have very little to add.
I agree that the removing of SRA download could be seen as a major upgrade, but I think this was a minor feature so I think it's still ok to go for a 3.2 release.

Copy link
Member

@JoseEspinosa JoseEspinosa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!
Ready to go after addressing @grst suggestions. 🚀

if (params.public_data_ids) {
include { SRA_DOWNLOAD } from './workflows/sra_download'
SRA_DOWNLOAD ()
include { RNASEQ } from './workflows/rnaseq'
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It became a bug now see here 😮

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yup. Saw that! Fixed, just in the nick of time 😆

@drpatelh
Copy link
Member Author

drpatelh commented Jun 18, 2021

Think I have addressed all of your comments now @grst! Thanks for the thorough review :)

Be awesome if you can create a small PR adding the regex functionality and then we can release.

@drpatelh
Copy link
Member Author

drpatelh commented Jun 18, 2021

We good to go now @grst ? Be awesome if you can approve. Sorry, tending to a sick baby so be good to get this out before **** hits the fan again!

@grst
Copy link
Member

grst commented Jun 18, 2021

Let's go! 💥

@drpatelh drpatelh merged commit 155a1a2 into master Jun 18, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants