-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Drop Android 4.0.x support #2923
Comments
I absolutely support this! I would probably make 5.0 the minimum version but as you say - baby steps! |
5.0 pls.
…On Fri, 24 Aug 2018, 10:01 ardevd, ***@***.***> wrote:
I absolutely support this! I would probably make 5.0 the minimum version
but as you say - baby steps!
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#2923 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAWsiwm5sPw3DoWglRC-V3WTxRokH5eks5uT7LngaJpZM4WK4Fu>
.
|
Well, dropping 4.x and making 5.x the minimum version would drop support for 3,4% of the active users where 4.4 has the same amount of users as 5.0 (with both having more than 5000 users each!). That is why I thought of baby steps since I don't see a good reason to drop support for >5000 people. Easier maintenance isn't an argument from my point of view if nobody finds the time to take care of improving the auto upload which is where > Android 5.0 might be helpful. So in my opinion just dropping 4.x and leaving the actual features as-is, is just dropping support for a lot of people for no reason. |
Currently we cannot drop 4.x support as this is a requirement for some customers. |
Which is why I opened the issue for dropping_4.0.x_only |
4.0 is fine and totally defendable IMO. And indeed baby steps. |
Last time I asked @oparoz, he said 4.x… |
@oparoz can you clarify on this, especially talking about 4.0.x (since it has been released Oct. 2011, overall market share <0,3%, for Nc it's <0,1% meaning 150 devices, declining by about 20% each month). |
@oparoz @tobiasKaminsky any news and feedback on dropping Android 4.0.x making Android 4.1 the minimum requirement? |
From my side, last info is that 4.x is required by a customer and thus we have to support it. |
Also note that google will most likely drop support for chrome in anything below 4.4 soon. |
@oparoz what is our least supported version? |
Google is even dropping support for it. So play services will no longer work. |
@rullzer do you have a reference for this? |
Again, and again and again: @tobiasKaminsky @oparoz can we get an answer on this? Keeping this blocked by not deciding on it since over a year is just sad |
What about this idea? So we would right now drop 4.0.x and have min 16? |
That chart is not really up to date. But I'm totally fine with starting to drop ancient versions. |
So which threshold are you proposing @tobiasKaminsky? Your last 2 comments propose different ones: 0.1 and 0.5. Personally I'd say 0.1 is too little but for 3.10 I'd say we can make v16 the min version. What do you think? After that I'd even go as far as to make Android 4.4 the min version for 3.11. |
0.1% seems very low to me ;) We don't even support browsers with that small percentage. IMO: 0.5% && EOL seems fair. |
I am with @rullzer on the threshold, <=0,5% and EOL |
Well then let us use 0.5% for the version after this (3.10). I update the overview issue then. |
I'd like to slowly but steadily remove support for (very) old Android versions and would like to start with dropping 4.0.x making 4.1 the minimum version (baby steps). Looking at the numbers the app lost 16% of the total 4.0.x active installations dropping down to 161 devices, so I think we are safe to remove the support after 3.3.x which would then be the last feature release which is the first one to support Nc14 features.
Here is the actual 4.0.x active installations graph for the last month:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ae941/ae9412a0133530c3ce284473a38244c36b5d2f7e" alt="android_4_0_x"
What do you think @mario @ardevd @tobiasKaminsky
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: