Use app monitoring instead of polling to establish websocket connection #80
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a new section in the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
Finishing Touches
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
Build for this pull request: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
src/events/action/actionAdded.ts (1)
1-6: Consider adding error handling and state validation.While the simplified logging is clean, consider adding:
- Error handling for edge cases
- State validation to ensure action addition was successful
export const handleActionAdded = () => { + try { logger.info("Action added"); + // Add state validation here if needed + } catch (error) { + logger.error("Failed to handle action addition", error); + } };src/plugin.ts (2)
33-35: Consider event handler registration order and error handling.The event handler registration should:
- Include error handling for registration failures
- Consider potential race conditions with other event handlers
+try { streamDeck.system.onApplicationDidLaunch(handleOnApplicationDidLaunch); streamDeck.system.onApplicationDidTerminate(handleOnApplicationDidTerminate); +} catch (error) { + logger.error("Failed to register application lifecycle handlers", error); +}
15-16: Verify application identifier consistency.Ensure the application identifier ("vATIS.exe") is defined as a constant and shared between the launch and terminate handlers for consistency.
+// Add to a shared constants file +export const VATIS_APP_IDENTIFIER = "vATIS.exe";com.neil-enns.vatis.sdPlugin/manifest.json (1)
39-42: LGTM! Good architectural improvement.Replacing polling with Stream Deck's native application monitoring is a solid architectural improvement that will:
- Reduce resource usage by eliminating polling
- Provide more reliable connection management
- Better integrate with the Stream Deck SDK's intended patterns
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
com.neil-enns.vatis.sdPlugin/manifest.json(1 hunks)src/events/action/actionAdded.ts(1 hunks)src/events/action/actionRemoved.ts(0 hunks)src/events/streamdeck/applicationDidLaunch.ts(1 hunks)src/events/streamdeck/applicationDidTerminate.ts(1 hunks)src/plugin.ts(2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- src/events/action/actionRemoved.ts
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/plugin.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-16: Verify manifest.json configuration.The AI summary mentions updates to manifest.json for ApplicationsToMonitor. Please ensure:
- The correct application identifier is specified
- Both Windows and macOS paths are properly configured
✅ Verification successful
ApplicationsToMonitor configuration is correctly implemented
The manifest.json contains proper application monitoring configuration for both platforms:
- Windows: Correctly monitors
vATIS.exe- macOS: Correctly monitors
org.vatsim.vatisbundle identifier🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check manifest.json configuration cat manifest.json | jq '.ApplicationsToMonitor'Length of output: 93
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for manifest files fd -e sdPlugin -e json -g "*manifest*" --type fLength of output: 92
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check ApplicationsToMonitor configuration in the correct manifest location cat "com.neil-enns.vatis.sdPlugin/manifest.json" | jq '.ApplicationsToMonitor'Length of output: 154
com.neil-enns.vatis.sdPlugin/manifest.json (1)
39-42: Verify application identifiers for both platforms.The implementation of application monitoring is a good approach to replace polling. However, let's verify the identifiers:
Consider making Windows executable matching case-insensitive
For Windows, you might want to consider if the executable name needs case-insensitive matching, as Windows executables can be launched with different casing.
"ApplicationsToMonitor": { "mac": ["org.vatsim.vatis"], - "windows": ["vATIS.exe"] + "windows": [ + "vATIS.exe", + "vatis.exe" + ] },✅ Verification successful
Application identifiers are correctly implemented
The manifest entries for both platforms are accurate and match the official vATIS application (v4.1.0-beta.4+). The implementation follows Stream Deck SDK conventions for application monitoring, and the case-sensitivity suggestion can be safely ignored as Windows handles executable names case-insensitively by default.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any references to the application identifiers in the codebase # to ensure consistency and verify if they're defined elsewhere echo "Searching for Mac bundle ID..." rg "org\.vatsim\.vatis" echo "Searching for Windows executable name..." rg -i "vATIS\.exe"Length of output: 356
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for documentation and configuration files echo "Searching for README and documentation..." fd -e md -e txt -x cat {} echo "Searching for any vATIS related naming patterns..." rg -i "vatis" --type-not json echo "Searching for package or build configuration files..." fd -e yaml -e yml -e config -e ini -x cat {}Length of output: 11755
|
Build for this pull request: |
Fixes #79
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Changes
Improvements