-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bugfix/empty seq #3025
Merged
Merged
Bugfix/empty seq #3025
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
50504c3
feat: implemented empty cmd seq event
jsilveira1409 1f9b7a6
Merge branch 'nasa:devel' into bugfix/empty-seq
jsilveira1409 8a2bca2
feat: improved empty seq warnings
jsilveira1409 8535003
feat: implemented ut for NoRecords Event
jsilveira1409 9034815
sp
LeStarch File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We need to clean-out the commented out code. Preferably we'd include the sequence name.
What scenario would this hit? Doesn't the sequence validation catch this (e.g. the CRC)?
Additionally, can this code be hit while a sequence is running? (e.g. the sequence file wasn't fully uplinked).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My bad for the comment, forgot about them!
cmdSeq.CS_VALIDATE
does validate empty command sequences:So actually the
CS_VALIDATE
would also need to trigger an empty command sequence event.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So actually, to encompass both cases, a more elegant solution could be to simply verify the number of records when loading the sequence file at
FPrimeSequence
level, and return false if the number of records is zero, which would trigger the following events:This would be the minor change:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the FileEmpty solution may be technically inaccurate as the file still contains a sequence header and so is not literally empty. If we're going to use an event, maybe we'd better call it
SeqEmpty
orNoRecords
, and make it clear in the error message that there specifically weren't any commands in the sequence. I like the second solution better, if this is the direction we choose to go.