-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update of clang tidy checks #2710
Update of clang tidy checks #2710
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am happy with these changes but I will want @Joshua-Anderson and @thomas-bc to weigh in.
The logic for separating out See this github workflow where At this moment, we could remove |
@Joshua-Anderson Thank you for the explanation, I am happy keeping two different files. I did not realize that the first call of |
@JohanBertrand I think we will need to go with @Joshua-Anderson's suggestion. The failure we see is recursion used in a UT. |
I reverted the clang-tidy configuration file changes and added some comments. It should be good to go! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good.
Change Description
release.clang-tidy
into.clang-tidy
and update CI. Unless it is used for somewhere externally, I do not see the file.clang-tidy
used anywhere otherwise.Rationale
Enforce consistent coding standard