-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 79
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Topic net responders #234
Topic net responders #234
Conversation
Shall we do a new release? Yes we should!
Towards release together with upcoming tidal 1.7
Fix for gain / overgain
var controls = synth.controls; | ||
var controlNames = msg[1]; | ||
controls.do{|control| controlNames = controlNames ++ " " ++ control.name}; | ||
tidalAddr.sendMsg("/dirt/synth-info/reply", controlNames); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One thing: don't you also want to send the default values over? Or is that not useful on the tidal side ...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That might be useful for the human user to know. There could be more info, like the normal range of the parameter, whether it can be controlled via a bus and so on.. So maybe we should think a bit ahead and flesh out #199 a bit first.
(This PR came from a question on the forum)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK, I'm going over there …
Maybe it's OK to merge this as-is? |
* reply to the tidal who most recently said hello * net responder to return information about a synth * clean up Co-authored-by: Julian Rohrhuber <rohrhuber@protonmail.com>
No description provided.