-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 62
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Several lists of modules are not consistent #136
Comments
I only see lists in the index page for the web and the README. I think we should consider structuring both as - so they are easier to maintain. WDYT? |
I see:
Unifying their format would indeed help to maintain them, and that should be done :) |
Thanks for catching the third one. I agree that this is a great beginner task. It is Hacktober after all :) |
These list should also be compared to the list of installed modules in the tarball: |
Following documentation style, added sections for modules/format not yet written in README and in po4a.7.pod Issue: mquinson#136
Following documentation style, added sections for modules/format not yet written in README and in po4a.7.pod Issue: mquinson#136
Following documentation style, added sections for modules/format not yet written in README and in po4a.7.pod Issue: #136
Solves issue mquinson/po4a#136
This issue was fixed by @VietThan. Many thanks for that! |
I have the feeling that the list of modules are not consistent nor accurate. I'd really appreciate if someone could double check that. We have one on the website, one in the README.md and one in the doc somewhere (can't remember where exactly).
Also, one should check whether these lists are accurate wrt to the actual list of modules that we have under lib/Locale/Po4a. Some modules (such as the text module) serve as an umbrella to several sub-types (such as fortune for the text module). It'd be excellent if the lists could show that too.
Thanks in advance,
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: