Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Trim down the InsecureConnection to a minimal implementation. #23

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 22, 2019

Conversation

rfk
Copy link
Contributor

@rfk rfk commented Jan 18, 2019

This exposes the same API as before, but uses no mock-TLS-like infrastructure that might look more secure than it is. The intention is to help the subsequent actual-TLS PR land more cleanly, since it will be a suite of entirely new files rather than diffs to existing "mock" files.

@rfk rfk requested a review from vladikoff January 18, 2019 00:56
This exposes the same API as before, but uses no mock-TLS-like
infrastructure that might look more secure than it is.  The intention
is to help the subsequent actual-TLS PR land more cleanly.
@rfk rfk force-pushed the trim-down-insecure-code branch from 365f77e to 54f3ba7 Compare January 18, 2019 01:18
Copy link
Contributor

@eoger eoger left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like this, keeps the structure but makes the code simpler to review later.

@rfk rfk merged commit 644db69 into master Jan 22, 2019
@vladikoff
Copy link
Contributor

👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants