-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add basic TLS1.3-PSK logic #20
Closed
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
It needs lots of tests, but it does interoperate sucessfully with an existing TLS1.3 implementation!
e77f43c
to
9c5ddae
Compare
9c5ddae
to
1da31dc
Compare
Closing in favour of the much cleaner diff in #24 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This adds actually-appears-to-be-functioning code to implement the TLS1.3 PSK mode. It needs a lot of tests, but I have confirmed that it interoperates successfully with an existing TLS library (tlslite-ng) so I have some base level of confidence that it's doing the right thing in the happy case.
This includes the latest from #14 and is rebased against latest master.
@vladikoff @eoger I reckon it's in sufficient shape for a preliminary r? from a "will we be able to maintain this code?" perspective, but needs tests before putting it in front of Martin et al.