Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

ci(NODE-6768): regenerate lockfile #4425

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 19, 2025
Merged

ci(NODE-6768): regenerate lockfile #4425

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 19, 2025

Conversation

baileympearson
Copy link
Contributor

@baileympearson baileympearson commented Feb 19, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Description

What is changing?

The lockfile got out of sync with the package.json, so npm ci failed in the check dependencies Github action.

Is there new documentation needed for these changes?

What is the motivation for this change?

Release Highlight

Fill in title or leave empty for no highlight

Double check the following

  • Ran npm run check:lint script
  • Self-review completed using the steps outlined here
  • PR title follows the correct format: type(NODE-xxxx)[!]: description
    • Example: feat(NODE-1234)!: rewriting everything in coffeescript
  • Changes are covered by tests
  • New TODOs have a related JIRA ticket

@baileympearson baileympearson marked this pull request as ready for review February 19, 2025 17:14
@baileympearson baileympearson requested a review from a team as a code owner February 19, 2025 17:14
@nbbeeken nbbeeken self-assigned this Feb 19, 2025
@nbbeeken nbbeeken added the Primary Review In Review with primary reviewer, not yet ready for team's eyes label Feb 19, 2025
@nbbeeken nbbeeken changed the title ci(NODE-6767): regenerate lockfile ci(NODE-6768): regenerate lockfile Feb 19, 2025
@nbbeeken nbbeeken merged commit a2998d5 into main Feb 19, 2025
12 of 13 checks passed
@nbbeeken nbbeeken deleted the NODE-6767-fix-check-dependencies branch February 19, 2025 17:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@nbbeeken nbbeeken nbbeeken approved these changes

Assignees

@nbbeeken nbbeeken

Labels
Primary Review In Review with primary reviewer, not yet ready for team's eyes
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@baileympearson @nbbeeken