Introduce JikesRVM-specific object accessor types (#177)

The main purpose of this PR is make a clear distinction between the
`ObjectReference` type in JikesRVM and the `ObjectReference` type in
mmtk-core.

This PR introduced `JikesObj`, a Rust type that represents the
JikesRVM-level `ObjectReference`. It needs an explicit conversion to
convert to/from the MMTk-level `ObjectReference` types.

The interface between mmtk-core and the mmtk-jikesrvm binding is
refactored to do fewer things with the MMTk-level `ObjectReference`.

- Trait methods that pass `ObjectReference` to the binding, notably the
methods in `ObjectModel`, now simply convert the MMTk-level
`ObjectReference` to `JikesObj`, and then call methods of `JikesObj`.
- Concrete methods for accessing object headers, fields, and layout
information are now implemented by `JikesObj` (and other wrapper types
including `TIB` and `RVMType`).
- The `JikesRVMSlot` trait now does the conversion between `JikesObj`
and the MMTk-level `ObjectReference` when loading or storing a slot.

This allows us to change the definition of the MMTk-level
`ObjectReference` in the future, while concrete methods of `JikesObj`
still use offset constants relative to the JikesRVM-level
`ObjectReference` which will not change.

The interface between the Rust part and the Java part of the binding are
refactored to involve `JikesObj` only.

- API functions in `api.rs` accept `JikesObj` parameters from JikesRVM
and return `JikeObj` to JikesRVM where JikesRVM uses the JikesRVM-level
`ObjectReference`.
- We wrap all JTOC calls into strongly-typed Rust functions, and make
the weakly-typed `jtoc_call!` macro private to the wrappers.

In this way, we ensure none of the API functions or JTOC calls leak the
MMTk-level `ObjectReference` values to JikesRVM, or accidentally
interpret a JikesRVM-level `ObjectReference` as an MMTk-level
`ObjectReference`.

We also do some obvious refactoring that makes the code more readable.:

- Encapsulated many field-loading statements in the form of `(addr +
XXXX_OFFSET)::load<T>()` into dedicated methods.
- Encapsulated the code for determining the overhead of hash fields into
a function `JikesObj::hashcode_overhead` and simplified many methods
that depend on that.
-   Renaming "edge" to "slot" in `RustScanThread.java`.

And obvious bug fixes:

- The call to `DO_REFERENCE_PROCESSING_HELPER_SCAN_METHOD_OFFSET` used
to erroneously interpret 0 as `true`. This has been fixed by relying on
the conversion trait.
- `scan_boot_image_sanity` used to declare an immutable array and let
unsafe `jtoc_call!` code modify it. The array is now defined as mutable.

Related issues and PRs:

- This PR is the 1st step of
#178
- It will ultimately allow mmtk/mmtk-core#1170
to be implemented.

jikesrvm/rvm/src/org/jikesrvm/mm/mminterface/RustScanThread.java

@@ -109,8 +109,8 @@
   private GCMapIterator iterator;
   @Untraced
   private boolean processCodeLocations;
-  private Address report_edges;
-  private Address report_edges_extra_data;
+  private Address reportSlots;
+  private Address reportSlotsExtraData;
   @Untraced
   private RVMThread thread;
   private Address ip, fp, prevFp, initialIPLoc, topFrame;
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@
   private boolean failed;
   private boolean reinstallReturnBarrier;
 
-  private Address edges;
+  private Address slots;
   private Word size = Word.zero();
   // The buffer size agreed between the Rust part and the Java part of the binding.
   // See the constant SLOTS_BUFFER_CAPACITY in scanning.rs.
@@ -135,15 +135,15 @@
    * Scan a thread, placing the addresses of pointers into supplied buffers.
    *
    * @param thread The thread to be scanned
-   * @param report_edges The native call-back function to use for reporting locations.
-   * @param report_edges_extra_data Extra data passed to the report_edges call-back.
+   * @param reportSlots The native call-back function to use for reporting locations.
+   * @param reportSlotsExtraData Extra data passed to the reportSlots call-back.
    * @param processCodeLocations Should code locations be processed?
    * @param newRootsSufficient Is a partial stack scan sufficient, or must we do a full scan?
    */
   @Entrypoint
   public static void scanThread(RVMThread thread,
-                                Address report_edges,
-                                Address report_edges_extra_data,
+                                Address reportSlots,
+                                Address reportSlotsExtraData,
                                 boolean processCodeLocations,
                                 boolean newRootsSufficient) {
     if (DEFAULT_VERBOSITY >= 1) {
@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ public static void scanThread(RVMThread thread,
     Address fp = regs.getInnermostFramePointer();
     regs.clear();
     regs.setInnermost(ip,fp);
-    scanThread(thread, report_edges, report_edges_extra_data, processCodeLocations, gprs, Address.zero(), newRootsSufficient);
+    scanThread(thread, reportSlots, reportSlotsExtraData, processCodeLocations, gprs, Address.zero(), newRootsSufficient);
   }
 
   /**
@@ -167,8 +167,8 @@ public static void scanThread(RVMThread thread,
    * structure.
    *
    * @param thread The thread to be scanned
-   * @param report_edges The native call-back function to use for reporting locations.
-   * @param report_edges_extra_data Extra data passed to the report_edges call-back.
+   * @param reportSlots The native call-back function to use for reporting locations.
+   * @param reportSlotsExtraData Extra data passed to the reportSlots call-back.
    * @param processCodeLocations Should code locations be processed?
    * @param gprs The general purpose registers associated with the
    * stack being scanned (normally extracted from the thread).
@@ -177,8 +177,8 @@ public static void scanThread(RVMThread thread,
    * @param newRootsSufficent Is a partial stack scan sufficient, or must we do a full scan?
    */
   private static void scanThread(RVMThread thread,
-                                 Address report_edges,
-                                 Address report_edges_extra_data,
+                                 Address reportSlots,
+                                 Address reportSlotsExtraData,
                                  boolean processCodeLocations,
                                  Address gprs,
                                  Address topFrame,
@@ -211,25 +211,25 @@ private static void scanThread(RVMThread thread,
     }
 
     /* scan the stack */
-    scanner.startScan(report_edges, report_edges_extra_data, processCodeLocations, thread, gprs, ip, fp, initialIPLoc, topFrame, sentinelFp);
+    scanner.startScan(reportSlots, reportSlotsExtraData, processCodeLocations, thread, gprs, ip, fp, initialIPLoc, topFrame, sentinelFp);
   }
 
   @Inline
-  private void reportEdge(Address edge) {
+  private void reportSlot(Address slot) {
     // Push value
     Word cursor = this.size;
     this.size = cursor.plus(Word.one());
-    if (VM.VerifyAssertions) VM._assert(!this.edges.isZero());
-    this.edges.plus(cursor.toInt() << LOG_BYTES_IN_WORD).store(edge);
+    if (VM.VerifyAssertions) VM._assert(!this.slots.isZero());
+    this.slots.plus(cursor.toInt() << LOG_BYTES_IN_WORD).store(slot);
     // Flush if full
     if (cursor.GE(SLOTS_BUFFER_CAPACITY)) {
       flush();
     }
   }
 
   private void flush() {
-    if (!edges.isZero() && !size.isZero()) {
-      edges = sysCall.sysDynamicCall3(report_edges, edges.toWord(), size, report_edges_extra_data.toWord());
+    if (!slots.isZero() && !size.isZero()) {
+      slots = sysCall.sysDynamicCall3(reportSlots, slots.toWord(), size, reportSlotsExtraData.toWord());
       size = Word.zero();
     }
   }
@@ -244,8 +244,8 @@ private void flush() {
    * The various state associated with stack scanning is captured by
    * instance variables of this type, which are initialized here.
    *
-   * @param report_edges The native call-back function to use for reporting locations.
-   * @param report_edges_extra_data Extra data passed to the report_edges call-back.
+   * @param reportSlots The native call-back function to use for reporting locations.
+   * @param reportSlotsExtraData Extra data passed to the reportSlots call-back.
    * @param processCodeLocations whether to process parts of the thread
    *  that could point to code (e.g. exception registers).
    * @param thread Thread for the thread whose stack is being scanned
@@ -261,16 +261,16 @@ private void flush() {
    * if this is to be inferred from the thread (normally the case).
    * @param sentinelFp The frame pointer at which the stack scan should stop.
    */
-  private void startScan(Address report_edges,
-                         Address report_edges_extra_data,
+  private void startScan(Address reportSlots,
+                         Address reportSlotsExtraData,
                          boolean processCodeLocations,
                          RVMThread thread, Address gprs, Address ip,
                          Address fp, Address initialIPLoc, Address topFrame,
                          Address sentinelFp) {
-    this.report_edges = report_edges;
-    this.report_edges_extra_data = report_edges_extra_data;
+    this.reportSlots = reportSlots;
+    this.reportSlotsExtraData = reportSlotsExtraData;
     this.size = Word.zero();
-    this.edges = sysCall.sysDynamicCall3(report_edges, Word.zero(), Word.zero(), report_edges_extra_data.toWord());
+    this.slots = sysCall.sysDynamicCall3(reportSlots, Word.zero(), Word.zero(), reportSlotsExtraData.toWord());
 
     this.processCodeLocations = processCodeLocations;
     this.thread = thread;
@@ -289,8 +289,8 @@ private void startScan(Address report_edges,
       VM.sysFail("Error encountered while scanning stack");
     }
     flush();
-    if (!edges.isZero()) {
-      sysCall.release_buffer(edges);
+    if (!slots.isZero()) {
+      sysCall.release_buffer(slots);
     }
   }
 
@@ -395,8 +395,7 @@ private void processCodeLocation(ObjectReference code, Address ipLoc) {
         if (!failed) failed = true;
       }
     }
-    reportEdge(ipLoc);
-    // sysCall.sysProcessInteriorEdge(trace, code, ipLoc, true);
+    reportSlot(ipLoc);
   }
 
   /***********************************************************************
@@ -503,8 +502,7 @@ private void scanFrameForObjects(int verbosity) {
          refaddr = iterator.getNextReferenceAddress()) {
       if (VALIDATE_REFS) checkReference(refaddr, verbosity);
       if (verbosity >= 4) dumpRef(refaddr, verbosity);
-      reportEdge(refaddr);
-      // reportDelayedRootEdge(trace, refaddr);
+      reportSlot(refaddr);
     }
   }
 

mmtk/Cargo.toml

@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ log = {version = "0.4", features = ["max_level_trace", "release_max_level_off"]
 # - change branch/rev
 # - change repo name
 # But other changes including adding/removing whitespaces in commented lines may break the CI.
-mmtk = { git = "https://github.com/mmtk/mmtk-core.git", rev = "160b7702fccda133c9407234821ad35103623179" }
+mmtk = { git = "https://github.com/mmtk/mmtk-core.git", rev = "b3385b85fe1adf96ce820b0ceae1efdcaafa9120" }
 # Uncomment the following to build locally - if you change the path locally, do not commit the change in a PR
 # mmtk = { path = "../repos/mmtk-core" }