Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Skins: polish fx chain controls #12805

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 15, 2024
Merged

Conversation

ronso0
Copy link
Member

@ronso0 ronso0 commented Feb 12, 2024

follow-up for #12735

  • layout effect chain controls evenly, with/without Super knobs
  • static Mix + Mix Mode controls when toggling Super knobs
  • slightly larger chain preset button in Tango, slightly smaller Mix Mode button

@github-actions github-actions bot added the skins label Feb 12, 2024
@ronso0 ronso0 added this to the 2.4.1 milestone Feb 18, 2024
@ronso0 ronso0 marked this pull request as ready for review February 18, 2024 22:37
@acolombier
Copy link
Member

Is this still targeted for 2.4.1 or should this be rebased/targeted to 2.5?

Also, could you please provide some screenshots of before/after like you did in #12735 so it's easier to see the UI changes?

@ronso0
Copy link
Member Author

ronso0 commented Apr 14, 2024

Sorry, too lazy to make before/after screenshots of 3 skins ; )
Should be tested manually anyway.

Basically, the Fx unit controls (Dry/Wet, mix mode, Super knob etc.) should look good in Deere, LateNight and Tango. I.e. no layout quirks, everything aligned nicely, no squeezed controls.

Yes, this should still go to 2.4.1

Copy link
Member

@daschuer daschuer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, Thank you.

@daschuer daschuer merged commit 6659944 into mixxxdj:2.4 Apr 15, 2024
14 checks passed
@ronso0 ronso0 deleted the skins-effect-units-polish branch April 15, 2024 21:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants