Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: add choosing a rep page + implications of using custodians #43

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 25, 2021

Conversation

mistakia
Copy link
Owner

@mistakia mistakia commented Jun 23, 2021

  • added a dedicated page for choosing a rep
  • moved things around to stress the importance of self-custody and the implications of using custodians

Related:
#42

@mistakia mistakia requested a review from SenatusSPQR June 23, 2021 16:26
@mistakia mistakia merged commit 665340f into main Jun 25, 2021
@mistakia mistakia deleted the docs/update-choosing-a-rep branch July 24, 2021 23:39
mistakia added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 9, 2022
Former-commit-id: a56f1d7fc20a6c0b0967bbf5f8c8f6dfe9f316a2 [formerly 665340f]
Former-commit-id: b21148f43168afb4988a284fa171ce99609dc127
ATXMJ pushed a commit to ATXMJ/nano-community that referenced this pull request Sep 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant