-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
MLPAB-397: How should the attorneys make decisions #192
Conversation
Codecov ReportBase: 93.37% // Head: 93.42% // Increases project coverage by
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #192 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 93.37% 93.42% +0.04%
==========================================
Files 46 47 +1
Lines 2506 2569 +63
==========================================
+ Hits 2340 2400 +60
- Misses 129 131 +2
- Partials 37 38 +1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. ☔ View full report at Codecov. |
"jointlyAndSeverallyMixed": "Jointly for some decisions, and jointly and severally for other decisions", | ||
"jointlyAndSeverallyMixedHint": "Attorneys must agree unanimously on some decisions, but can make others on their own. The donor must state which decisions need to be agreed unanimously.", | ||
"decisionDetailsHint": " Please tell us which decisions the donor wants to be made jointly. These decisions will be printed on a extra sheet that the donor will need to sign and date. Take a look at the guidance for examples of how the donor can make their wishes clear.", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ha, extra sheets
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I know 😂
Purpose
Prompts the donor to confirm on how multiple attorneys should act. Single attorneys won't be shown the question.
Fixes MLPAB-397
Approach
I've extended the radios partial to allow conditionally revealing textareas. This code has got a little busy now and there may be a cleaner way to implement this so open for feedback there.
Learning
There's a known aria bug related to conditionally revealing inputs using the GDS radio component. I've excluded that specific rules in the cypress tests until its resolved.
Checklist