Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Security upgrade rails from 7.1.4.1 to 7.1.5.1 #358

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

arthurashman
Copy link
Contributor

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the rubygems dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • Gemfile
  • Gemfile.lock

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
low severity Cross-site Scripting (XSS)
SNYK-RUBY-ACTIONPACK-8496389
  391  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Cross-site Scripting (XSS)

@arthurashman arthurashman requested a review from a team as a code owner December 12, 2024 03:45
@timpeat timpeat force-pushed the snyk-fix-fbc914588c63a7be9742c43279f716a8 branch from a902757 to 36f8f8f Compare January 2, 2025 17:30
@timpeat timpeat force-pushed the snyk-fix-fbc914588c63a7be9742c43279f716a8 branch from 36f8f8f to fe60823 Compare January 17, 2025 15:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants