-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 105
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Bug]: BootAuditTestApp is not Passable due to UefiVarCheck #252
Labels
state:needs-triage
Needs to triaged to determine next steps
type:bug
Something isn't working
urgency:medium
Important with a moderate impact
Comments
This was referenced Jun 2, 2023
TaylorBeebe
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 6, 2023
## Description BootAuditTestApp tests the variable policy for the SysPrep####, PlatformRecovery####, and Driver#### variables by attempting to get and set the variables. When calling SetVariable with one of these three variables, VarCheckLib will sanity check the variable data and return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER if the data is not a valid load option. Because we want to check if the variables are writable, we need to create properly formatted data before calling SetVariable. This PR uses the DevicePath of the running EFI application to create a load option to properly test the writability of the boot option variables securely. Fixes Issue #252 - [x] Impacts functionality? - **Functionality** - Does the change ultimately impact how firmware functions? - Examples: Add a new library, publish a new PPI, update an algorithm, ... - [ ] Impacts security? - **Security** - Does the change have a direct security impact on an application, flow, or firmware? - Examples: Crypto algorithm change, buffer overflow fix, parameter validation improvement, ... - [ ] Breaking change? - **Breaking change** - Will anyone consuming this change experience a break in build or boot behavior? - Examples: Add a new library class, move a module to a different repo, call a function in a new library class in a pre-existing module, ... - [x] Includes tests? - **Tests** - Does the change include any explicit test code? - Examples: Unit tests, integration tests, robot tests, ... - [ ] Includes documentation? - **Documentation** - Does the change contain explicit documentation additions outside direct code modifications (and comments)? - Examples: Update readme file, add feature readme file, link to documentation on an a separate Web page, ... ## How This Was Tested Tested on Q35 ## Integration Instructions N/A
Fixed with #256 |
TaylorBeebe
added a commit
to TaylorBeebe/mu_plus
that referenced
this issue
Jun 6, 2023
…osoft#256) ## Description BootAuditTestApp tests the variable policy for the SysPrep####, PlatformRecovery####, and Driver#### variables by attempting to get and set the variables. When calling SetVariable with one of these three variables, VarCheckLib will sanity check the variable data and return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER if the data is not a valid load option. Because we want to check if the variables are writable, we need to create properly formatted data before calling SetVariable. This PR uses the DevicePath of the running EFI application to create a load option to properly test the writability of the boot option variables securely. Fixes Issue microsoft#252 - [x] Impacts functionality? - **Functionality** - Does the change ultimately impact how firmware functions? - Examples: Add a new library, publish a new PPI, update an algorithm, ... - [ ] Impacts security? - **Security** - Does the change have a direct security impact on an application, flow, or firmware? - Examples: Crypto algorithm change, buffer overflow fix, parameter validation improvement, ... - [ ] Breaking change? - **Breaking change** - Will anyone consuming this change experience a break in build or boot behavior? - Examples: Add a new library class, move a module to a different repo, call a function in a new library class in a pre-existing module, ... - [x] Includes tests? - **Tests** - Does the change include any explicit test code? - Examples: Unit tests, integration tests, robot tests, ... - [ ] Includes documentation? - **Documentation** - Does the change contain explicit documentation additions outside direct code modifications (and comments)? - Examples: Update readme file, add feature readme file, link to documentation on an a separate Web page, ... ## How This Was Tested Tested on Q35 ## Integration Instructions N/A
TaylorBeebe
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 7, 2023
## Description BootAuditTestApp tests the variable policy for the SysPrep####, PlatformRecovery####, and Driver#### variables by attempting to get and set the variables. When calling SetVariable with one of these three variables, VarCheckLib will sanity check the variable data and return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER if the data is not a valid load option. Because we want to check if the variables are writable, we need to create properly formatted data before calling SetVariable. This PR uses the DevicePath of the running EFI application to create a load option to properly test the writability of the boot option variables securely. Fixes Issue #252 - [x] Impacts functionality? - **Functionality** - Does the change ultimately impact how firmware functions? - Examples: Add a new library, publish a new PPI, update an algorithm, ... - [ ] Impacts security? - **Security** - Does the change have a direct security impact on an application, flow, or firmware? - Examples: Crypto algorithm change, buffer overflow fix, parameter validation improvement, ... - [ ] Breaking change? - **Breaking change** - Will anyone consuming this change experience a break in build or boot behavior? - Examples: Add a new library class, move a module to a different repo, call a function in a new library class in a pre-existing module, ... - [x] Includes tests? - **Tests** - Does the change include any explicit test code? - Examples: Unit tests, integration tests, robot tests, ... - [ ] Includes documentation? - **Documentation** - Does the change contain explicit documentation additions outside direct code modifications (and comments)? - Examples: Update readme file, add feature readme file, link to documentation on an a separate Web page, ... ## How This Was Tested Tested on Q35 ## Integration Instructions N/A
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
state:needs-triage
Needs to triaged to determine next steps
type:bug
Something isn't working
urgency:medium
Important with a moderate impact
Is there an existing issue for this?
Current Behavior
BootAuditTestApp attempts to write to various boot variables to check if they are write protected. There exists a sanity check which ensures that the set value makes sense, but BootAuditTestApp passes in garbage data causing the SetVariable() call to return Invalid Parameter.
Expected Behavior
BootAuditTestApp should be able to test all UEFI boot variables.
Steps To Reproduce
Run the test app on a platform with UefiVarCheckLib included.
Build Environment
Version Information
Urgency
Medium
Are you going to fix this?
I will fix it
Do you need maintainer feedback?
No maintainer feedback needed
Anything else?
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: