Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test(ts-toolbelt): recursive iteration types #33810

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Dec 5, 2019
Merged

test(ts-toolbelt): recursive iteration types #33810

merged 4 commits into from
Dec 5, 2019

Conversation

millsp
Copy link
Contributor

@millsp millsp commented Oct 4, 2019

Added a test for recursive iteration types to preserve ts-toolbelt's recursion capabilities in the future (as discussed with @sandersn)

@msftclas
Copy link

msftclas commented Oct 4, 2019

CLA assistant check
All CLA requirements met.

@millsp
Copy link
Contributor Author

millsp commented Oct 4, 2019

I believe the build is failing because of master. Will retry when master is passing its tests again.

Copy link
Member

@sandersn sandersn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good with two comments:

  1. @weswigham recently changed the user test format. @weswigham can you make sure this is valid?
  2. Do you mind commenting at the top that this library is most widely used in ramda?

@millsp
Copy link
Contributor Author

millsp commented Oct 15, 2019

Thanks @sandersn.

I just added it.

@millsp millsp requested a review from sandersn November 30, 2019 11:46
@millsp
Copy link
Contributor Author

millsp commented Nov 30, 2019

Hey @sandersn, is this still going to be merged? Or is there anything blocking it?

@sandersn
Copy link
Member

sandersn commented Dec 5, 2019

Sorry, I lost track of this. Thanks for the ping.

@sandersn sandersn merged commit 9a766c3 into microsoft:master Dec 5, 2019
@millsp
Copy link
Contributor Author

millsp commented Dec 5, 2019

I can imagine all the stuff you've got on your list. No worries! Thanks for merging 🎉

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants