Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: remove github secrets from config #2991

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 11, 2020
Merged

fix: remove github secrets from config #2991

merged 2 commits into from
May 11, 2020

Conversation

benbrown
Copy link
Contributor

config inside the github sample plugin included (old) secrets

config inside the github sample plugin included (old) secrets
@github-actions
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 0.0% when pulling 83ed67b on benbrown-patch-1 into f67fcab on master.

Copy link
Contributor

@srinaath srinaath left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we obliterate all historical commits to this file and create the file new in this PR to avoid showing the secret in old commits. Might not be of much value I guess if the secret and ID are no longer in use or have been changed. If thats the case then we are fine with this commit.

@benbrown
Copy link
Contributor Author

These secrets have been completely invalid for a while... I think that is sufficient, but I'm not an expert!

@srinaath
Copy link
Contributor

Got it @benbrown .. I also agree with you. Should be sufficient.

@a-b-r-o-w-n a-b-r-o-w-n merged commit 9583747 into master May 11, 2020
@a-b-r-o-w-n a-b-r-o-w-n deleted the benbrown-patch-1 branch May 11, 2020 20:16
lei9444 pushed a commit to lei9444/BotFramework-Composer-1 that referenced this pull request Jun 15, 2021
config inside the github sample plugin included (old) secrets

Co-authored-by: Andy Brown <asbrown002@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants