forked from ziglang/zig
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
compiler: move unions into InternPool
There are a couple concepts here worth understanding: Key.UnionType - This type is available *before* resolving the union's fields. The enum tag type, number of fields, and field names, field types, and field alignments are not available with this. InternPool.UnionType - This one can be obtained from the above type with `InternPool.loadUnionType` which asserts that the union's enum tag type has been resolved. This one has all the information available. Additionally: * ZIR: Turn an unused bit into `any_aligned_fields` flag to help semantic analysis know whether a union has explicit alignment on any fields (usually not). * Sema: delete `resolveTypeRequiresComptime` which had the same type signature and near-duplicate logic to `typeRequiresComptime`. - Make opaque types not report comptime-only (this was inconsistent between the two implementations of this function). * Implement accepted proposal ziglang#12556 which is a breaking change.
- Loading branch information
Showing
27 changed files
with
1,396 additions
and
1,358 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.